The article said: Republicans said they could not vote for a bill that included provisions opposed by their core constituents.
This is all very nice and warm and fuzzy, but why did so dang many republicans vote for those dumb-ass amendments to begin with?
No amendments would have meant a clean bill that may have had a good chance of passing.
This bill was NOT about guns; it was about trial lawyers.
posted on 03/03/2004 3:14:03 PM PST
To: dbwz; B4Ranch
"This bill was NOT about guns; it was about trial lawyers."
And who else do you think will be leading the pack to kill our 2nd Amendment rights?
posted on 03/03/2004 3:21:08 PM PST
(U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson