Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Law of The Sea By Dark of Night
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 3/03/04 | Paul M. Weyrich

Posted on 3/3/2004, 10:42:03 AM by kattracks

A veteran Hill staffer remarked to me last week that for the first time since the 2002 elections she misses Senator Jesse Helms (R-NC). Helms finished his Senate career as Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, after having been chairman for several terms.

The new Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee is Sen. Dick Lugar (R-IN), a veteran of 28 years in the Senate. Lugar has waited a long time to become Chairman. Following the 1986 elections he attempted to get his colleagues to dump Helms, who had shifted from being Chairman of the Agriculture Committee to Ranking Member of the Foreign Relations Committee.

Helms had long wanted to be Chairman of Foreign Relations. But in the 1984 campaign he promised he would stay as Chairman of the Agriculture Committee, since that position was helpful to tobacco and other farmers in North Carolina.

He kept his promise for the next Congressional term but in the1986 elections Republicans lost control of the Senate, so Helms saw his opportunity to move. His seniority permitted him to move to Foreign Relations, but Republicans had devalued seniority a bit by permitting Senators to challenge a Chairmanship, or in this case, Ranking Member.

Lugar, who was four years junior to Helms, made that challenge but he lost badly. Even though the Foreign Relations Committee had never had a strong conservative as Ranking Member, Senators still respected seniority and Helms was installed. Then after eight years in that position, Republicans regained control of the Senate in the 1994 elections.

Helms became Chairman all the way through 2001 when Senator Jefford's change of party made Helms the Ranking Member again. Had Helms run for another term and won, even though Republicans again became the Majority Party, he could not have continued as Chairman of Foreign Relations since new rules put term limits on Committee Chairmanships.

So, Lugar finally got the Chairmanship he prized. Although Lugar has a fairly strong conservative voting record, it was always understood that he was no Jesse Helms. Indeed Lugar's 1986 challenge of Helms was based on what was perceived as concern about Helms' conservatism.

Surprisingly, Helms got along well with his Democrat colleagues. First there was Sen. Claiborne Pell (D-RI) and then later Sen. Joseph Biden (D-DE). Together they forged a bi-partisan approach to foreign policy. But one thing Helms did was to sit on various treaties, which various Presidents had agreed to, but had never been ratified by the U.S. Senate.

The reason this veteran Hill staff member said she missed Helms was because Lugar has revived the Law of the Sea Treaty and got it passed out of committee. This treaty had been bottled up since early in the Reagan Administration when the President made it clear he did not support it.

Something has happened to Lugar in this episode because the way he behaved regarding this treaty is NOT vintage Lugar. He would not let real opponents of the treaty testify against it. He passed it without warning in what we call in the Senate, "a Midnight-style raid." He prevented other Senators on the Armed Services and Intelligence Committees from seeing the whole treaty.

Lugar, who began his long political career as Mayor of Indianapolis (in the late 1960's President Richard Nixon called him his favorite Mayor), came to the Senate in the 1976 election. He soon developed a reputation for thoughtful approaches to problems. While always a globalist on international questions, Lugar has been very conservative on social issues and was one of the few Republicans who was willing to actually cut programs when Ronald Reagan was elected President. His evenhandedness on very emotional and highly controversial issues is legendary.

Thus there has to be an out-of-the-box explanation for Lugar's behavior on the Law of the Sea Treaty, which is a huge giveaway of American sovereignty, and which sets up a system to transfer wealth from the United States to places that don't deserve it. In addition, this treaty is a real step toward global government, giving decisions on matters of concern to America - to The Hague.

It is not like Lugar to want to pass something like this with an iron hand. First, Indiana is a very conservative state when it comes to issues such as this. Second, because this undoes his long-established reputation for fairness and evenhandedness.
Lugar ran for President briefly in 1996. His campaign was short lived. At his age, he is not likely to try that again.

So what is he angling for with this move which is bound to be unpopular back home and which may not even sit well with George Bush?

Well, John Kerry has at least an even chance to be elected President. If some polls are right, he has a better than even chance. No doubt Lugar has given up his ambitions to be President, but the next best thing for a globalist such as Lugar would be to be Secretary of State. Now, Senator Kerry has already suggested that he might bring Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) into his Administration if elected to the Presidency, so why not Lugar? About the only thing that could explain Lugar's behavior is that he is angling for Secretary of State in a Kerry Administration.

Of course, Lugar's longtime associate and former Chief of Staff, Mitch Daniels, is running for Governor of Indiana. Daniels thought he would be running in an open seat. But the incumbent governor up and died. And the Lt. Governor, who then became Governor, said he was retiring too.

Apparently, however, he liked living in the Governor's mansion. He now is running for election as the incumbent. If Kerry wins, and a Democrat were Governor of Indiana, a Lugar appointment as Secretary of State would also put another Democrat in the U.S. Senate. That might even switch party control, which would be in Kerry's interest.

That theory may be wrong, but whatever accounts for Lugar's sudden rash of unfairness, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, who schedules legislation for a vote, must keep the Law of the Sea Treaty from coming to a vote.

Perhaps if Sen. Frist delivers a bit of reality to the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, he will return to his penchant for fairness and decency. The old Lugar was certainly preferable to the new one.

(Paul M. Weyrich is chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation.)


Copyright 2004, Free Congress Foundation


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: dicklugar; foreignrelations; freetrade; jessehelms; lost; nwo; paulmweyrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 3/3/2004, 10:42:04 AM by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bttt
2 posted on 3/3/2004, 1:38:44 PM by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This is a very strange story. The Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) was a huge goal of liberals back in the early 1980's -- it's like a really bad dream to learn that the treaty has been dug up from oblivion.

What the heck is going on?
3 posted on 3/3/2004, 2:31:08 PM by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
LOST is a redistributionist relic that should have stayed buried and will ensure that the deep sea floor will never be developed by Americans if it is passed. It is a nightmare for entrepreneurs. Can you imagine trying to get a business permit to exploit deep seabed mineral discoveries from the U.N., or worse, pay them taxes for it?

Lugar is a globalist sellout traitor that is further proof the RINOs run the show in the Senate.
4 posted on 3/3/2004, 4:57:31 PM by LibertarianInExile (<--Outsourced myself. The first $70K in income is IRS free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Sadly Dick Lugar has not been very conservative for a long time(AWB, gay marriage & CFR come to mind). It seems to be a problem endemic to many former, aging conservatives. As they get closer to retirement age they decide that to go out with a "good" name they have to become more progressive in their thinking. I think Lugar is also trying to win a Noble Prize for his work on the disrming of the Soviet nuclear arsenal, and we all know conservatives never get consideration for such things.

I really wish the State Reps would give Dick a gold watch and a great going away party and nominate a young, solid conservative for his seat like Steve Buyer, Mike Pence or Dave McIntosh. But of course they won't so we will be left to either not vote for Senator or vote for the lesser of two evils.....AGAIN.
5 posted on 3/3/2004, 6:09:52 PM by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; farmfriend; harpseal; editor-surveyor; A. Pole; Willie Green; sauropod; *"Free" Trade; ..
Guys, As Henry Lamb says, TELL EVERYBODY!!! Peace and love, George.
6 posted on 3/5/2004, 5:53:21 PM by George Frm Br00klyn Park (FREEDOM!!!!!!!!! GO PAT GO!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George Frm Br00klyn Park; Carry_Okie; farmfriend; RickofEssex; ladylib; F.J. Mitchell; ...
Sage advice from Carry_Okie:

Among the treaty’s many flaws, it authorizes the U.N. to impose a tax, and to extract royalties on activities in and on the international seabed. It requires the transfer of technology - including information that may have security implications. For more detailed information about this terrible treaty, see these two great articles by Frank Gaffney, Assistant Secretary of Defense under Ronald Reagan.
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/index.jsp?section=papers&code=04-D_08

http://www.nationalreview.com/gaffney/gaffney200402261356.asp

We must take two actions - NOW!

First, call Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist - 202-224-3344 - and ask him to not allow this treaty to by placed on the “unanimous consent” calendar.

Next, call your Senator, and ask him/her to file an objection to force a floor debate and vote. Then ask the Senator to vote against the treaty.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1090586/posts
7 posted on 3/5/2004, 6:00:03 PM by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: George Frm Br00klyn Park; Carry_Okie; farmfriend; RickofEssex; ladylib; F.J. Mitchell
I called Senator Frists office. The fellow that answered the phone said he was not allowed to talk about LOST. He did put me through to the comment line, where I left the message that the treaty should not be placed on the unanimous consent calendar and that the treaty will greatly harm our sovereignty as a nation.

The fellow would not give out the direct number for the comment line, he said if you want to comment call 202-224-3344. So I say PING your PING lists and call away!

So much for transparency in government BTW.
8 posted on 3/5/2004, 6:27:30 PM by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kt56
See post #8.
9 posted on 3/5/2004, 6:28:09 PM by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
10 posted on 3/5/2004, 6:31:32 PM by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
The fellow that answered the phone said he was not allowed to talk about LOST.

LOL! That must have been after I was done with him. I took the time to tell him about how provisions of treaties passed by unanimous consent come back to bite this country and gave him the example of the Convention on Nature Protection and how it has effected the ESA.

11 posted on 3/5/2004, 6:40:34 PM by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!
12 posted on 3/5/2004, 6:41:18 PM by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Sage advice from Carry_Okie:

BTW, I didn't write that; I just quoted Henry Lamb.

13 posted on 3/5/2004, 6:41:39 PM by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Other FR threads on this:

Global nightmare: Saving the LOST

John Kerry’s Treaty - Outsourcing sovereignty

14 posted on 3/5/2004, 6:43:09 PM by TigersEye (Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
The fellow that answered the phone said he was not allowed to talk about LOST.

So much for transparency in government BTW. - hedgetrimmer

So much for a representative government!

15 posted on 3/5/2004, 6:46:01 PM by TigersEye (Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; kt56; All
Just got off the phone with Senator Boxer's office. The fellow that answered there said that if I could get a group of people to write letters, that it would have more impact.

So the gauntlet has been thrown!

Interestingly one of the first questions he asked was if I represented an organization. Constituent or no, its time to write some letters, I think.
16 posted on 3/5/2004, 6:51:08 PM by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart; kristinn; Angelwood; tgslTakoma; countrydummy; Carry_Okie; Noumenon; hosepipe; ...
Bad news ping.
17 posted on 3/5/2004, 10:34:55 PM by sauropod (I intend to have Red Kerry choke on his past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Yes it is.

Pls. include me on your ping list in the future.

18 posted on 3/5/2004, 10:37:03 PM by sauropod (I intend to have Red Kerry choke on his past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sauropod; Jim Robinson
Amazing how little interest there has been on this here on FR. The Senate looks to modify the supreme law of the land without a recorded vote and few seem to care.
19 posted on 3/5/2004, 10:44:09 PM by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
the deep sea floor will never be developed

Not by Americans, not by anyone. It's much the same deal as the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty, which ensures there will be no commercial development of outer space resources, i.e., none by anyone.

20 posted on 3/5/2004, 10:48:34 PM by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson