To: karnage
I'm a traditional Catholic. I think a sympathetic portrayal of Judas is a brilliant idea; after all he was one of Jesus' closest friends... his corruption and downfall must be classic fodder for a tragedy. I sincerely hope you're not blindsided by the criticism here. We need Christians in Hollywood.
I have to ask, though: That dialog from the Temple... how could you have Jesus say that? It asserts that Jesus believed he was wrong to drive away the money-changers as he did. In fact, if it were true, it would be Jesus committing a venial sin!
67 posted on
03/03/2004 3:53:49 PM PST by
dangus
To: dangus
With a movie like this, we tried to anticipate questions and objections wherever possible - and we all missed this one - Father Frank, Tom and myself. If I had it to do over again, I would have changed that line of dialogue so that instead of saying, "I lost my temper," Jesus would have said something about his anger - however justifiable and righteous - not being the main thrust of his mission. Or something like that.
68 posted on
03/03/2004 4:03:37 PM PST by
karnage
To: dangus
With a movie like this, we tried to anticipate questions and objections wherever possible - and we all missed this one - Father Frank, Tom and myself. If I had it to do over again, I would have changed that line of dialogue so that instead of saying, "I lost my temper," Jesus would have said something about his anger - however justifiable and righteous - not being the main thrust of his mission. Or something like that.
69 posted on
03/03/2004 4:03:45 PM PST by
karnage
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson