Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Check_Your_Premises
Keep in mind, government expenditures are included in GDP figures. So the economy might suck, all things being equal, but if the government spends a bunch of cash...

But shouldn't the resulting dead weight loss offset any growth in GDP due to larger government expenditures?

32 posted on 03/03/2004 2:39:24 PM PST by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: MegaSilver
by "dead weight loss" do you mean the use of money spent by the government? Or do you mean the debt the government incurs by spending what it doesn't have?

When the government spends money (even money it doesn't have) it does grow the economy. Things are still being bought and sold. Money is still exchanging hands.

The problem of the government spending money is that it is often done for political reasons instead of economic reasons. This causes resources to be allocated inefficiently. Is this the dead weight you speak of?

When (rational) private entities spend money it is done for economic reasons. This causes resources to be allocated most efficiently.

The more efficiently resources are allocated translates to a better overall standard of living. Incidentally, this is why outsourcing isn't the bogeyman so many think, it is merely allocating resources more efficiently. You may have to get a different/less paying job but everything will be far cheaper. Your salary/cost of living ratio will ultimately be less.

92 posted on 03/04/2004 7:51:55 AM PST by Check_Your_Premises (To crush your enemies, and see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson