Well gosh, perhaps the implication in the post I responded to, not withstanding your disclaimer.
I implied nothing; you drew an inference that was contradicted by what I explicitly said. My "disclaimer" withstands, actually. Face it, there's not a thing Bush will do to appease you and the rest of the clowder here or on ElPeePee. You know it and so does everyone who's followed your anti Bush rants., The "I want to help the president"still rings as hollow as when Jim Wright uttered that junk in the 80's. Frankly, you and the clowder do come up with great sounding things, but in reality, it's the same whining screed, posted with the same cute picture. I know, you'll deny, demand proof , and when it's handed to you, demand more.
What proof? You post strawmen. Reminds me of the press and the Dems screeching about the Bush's Guard records. Did you "help " them with that just like you're "helping" the President?
Non sequiter, to the extent that it's intelligible. Ah, don't bother, it'll be another self righteous screed with your kitty cat.What a man of principle! You and Honest John Kerry,the man who calls it what "it" is, til tomorrow of course.
Nice. Those ad hominems make a fallacy trifecta for your post. Cordially,I like the sarcasm here, actually. It's your most consistently effective rhetorical tool.
|
