To: cyncooper
Oh, so it is somehow okay as long as that dead person is anonymous? Look, if they want to show the flag-draped coffin of a Bush supporter with the consent of the family, go for it. But to use the image of a dead man with no regard for who he/she was or what they believed, or without any idea whether that person would approve or disapprove of the use of their image, is presumptuous and wrong.
142 posted on
03/05/2004 10:31:35 AM PST by
lugsoul
(Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
To: lugsoul
Not only is it somehow OK, it is the right thing to do.
Why don't you explain exactly why it is wrong to refer to that day and show fleeting scenes of what happened.
144 posted on
03/05/2004 11:27:08 AM PST by
cyncooper
("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
To: lugsoul
And I'll presume that someone murdered on that day would not object to the person prosecuting the war on terror referring to their death anymore than a murder victim objects to the prosecutor showing the jury a picture of their corpse.
145 posted on
03/05/2004 11:29:10 AM PST by
cyncooper
("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson