Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: budwiesest
"Good article. What's perplexing to me lately is how it has been percieved that limitations on freedom of expression (see shock-jocks, firings, Clear Channel, Janet Jackson's boob, for example) are being interpreted as the result of something coming from the Bush White House."

Democrats are just as much, if not more responsible. But no one wants to see that. I haven't heard George bush say anything about that sniveling idiot Howard Stern but Stern directs his diatribes against Bush.

And let's take this a step further. Stern only belives in the rule of law and The Constitution where his concerns are met. He claims to belive in the first amendment but ignores the second amendment which for practical purposes protects the first. I guess it's a matter of whose ox is gored.

Off my soap box.

Bart.

45 posted on 03/04/2004 10:36:38 PM PST by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: blackbart.223
Democrats are just as much, if not more responsible.

True, I can only imagine the liberal geniuses that put that half-time show together. In the minds of many, the 2nd ammendment doesn't even exist but the 1st sure does (and then there was CFR).

An infringment here, an infringment there, pretty soon your infringed. The Left would wrap us in duct tape and chains if allowed to infringe to their heart's content. The problem is: getting this message to others who may not have been paying attention during the Clinton years or were simply too young.

Gore was a bore, but Kerry is f-ing scary. There's more to lose this time around.

60 posted on 03/04/2004 10:59:47 PM PST by budwiesest (Restore the 2nd ammendment to it's full intent and I'll vote for you. Otherwise......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson