[stands2reason]

Joel Siegel gave it a good review and saw no antiSemitism in the film. And he's Jewish.

[wardaddy]

Charles Krauthammer on guns (4-5-1996, Page A19):

Ultimately, a civilized society must disarm its citizenry if it is to have a modicum of domestic tranquility of the kind enjoyed by sister democracies such as Canada and Britain. Given the frontier history and individualist ideology of the United States, however, this will not come easily. It certainly cannot be done radically. It will probably take one, maybe two generations. It might be 50 years before the United States gets to where Britain is today. Passing a law like the assault weapons ban is a symbolic - purely symbolic - move in that direction. Its only real justification is not to reduce crime but to desensitize the public to the regulation of weapons in preparation for their ultimate confiscation.

That's two strikes Chuckie!

[wardaddy]

Thank you. I'm trying to keep up with notable Jews who support either the film itself or consider it fair enough.

Medved, Lapin, Seigel, Bruckheimer, and some guy with Netanyahu had a column in the JP last week. I'm sure there are more....well, dang I know there are....a fair number of Jewish FReepers as well...not all but more than a few.

There are very very few Conservative Christians against the film and usually sadly because of some dumb archaic post Reformation garbage.

Thanks.