Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gang of Five; mware; ninenot; johnb2004
There's an excellent paragraph or two, whaling on the critics.

Thanks for the link! You must be referring to this ...

March 5, 2004       

  

CRITICS SEE PORN AND S&M IN “THE PASSION”

 

The following quotes are from the critics of “The Passion of the Christ”:

 

—Rev. Andrew Greeley calls it “sadomasochistic and pornographic.”

—Christopher Hitchens dubs it “an exercise in lurid sadomasochism.”

—Ex-priest John Dominic Crossan labels it “pornographic.”

—David Edelstein of Slate finds it an “exercise in sadomasochism.’

—Rabbi James Rudin brands it “a sadomasochistic film.”

—David Denby of The New Yorker opines “It’s extremely sadistic.”

—Jonathan Foreman of the New York Post says it’s “pornographic.”

—A.O. Scott of the New York Times sees it as “high-minded sadomasochism.”

—Andrew Sullivan was shocked to find it “pornographic.”

—Rev. Michael Coffey, a Lutheran minister, says it’s “pornographic.”

—David Ansen of Newsweek screams “It’s the sadism” that’s troubling.

—Jamie Bernard of the Daily News notes it “would horrify the regulars at an S&M club.”

—Ex-priest James Carroll sees the film as nothing but “pornographic.”

—Leon Wieseltier of the New Republic dubs it “a repulsive masochistic fantasy, a sacred snuff film.”

—Harvard professor Daniel Jonah Goldhagen was aghast at the “sadomasochistic, orgiastic display” and its “unremitting sadism.”

—Charles Krauthammer of the Washington Post calls it “the most unremitting sadism in the history of film.”

—Bill Safire in the New York Times complains of its “sustained sadism.”

—Al Neuharth of USA TODAY calls it a “wasted exercise in sadomasochism.”

 

Catholic League president William Donohue responds as follows:

 

“Christians need to take note of this mental goose-stepping, but they should also note that none of these savants found ‘Schindler’s List’ to be pornographic. What they find pornographic is the scourging and crucifixion of Jesus Christ.  No doubt for some of them, the New Testament classifies as pornography as well.  Indeed that is exactly what a Brooklyn rabbi told me to my face.  At least now it’s out in the open.”


18 posted on 03/05/2004 7:39:54 PM PST by NYer (Ad Jesum per Mariam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: NYer
Hitchens also said it was "homo-erotic".
21 posted on 03/05/2004 11:58:13 PM PST by Deb (My Tag Skies to Gotham & Con-Fabs With Net Prexies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
—Rev. Andrew Greeley calls it “sadomasochistic and pornographic.”

I am sending an email to Hardball this morning. He stated on the show that the line, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do" " was not in the movie. Jim Caviezel did an interview for World Over Live last night and when questioned about it was stunned. Paraphrasing Mr. Caviezel, he said, I don't know where the Father was during the movie but that is one of the few dialogs we repeated 3 times in the movie. Two of the times was when he was being nailed to the cross and another time on the cross.

23 posted on 03/06/2004 6:28:37 AM PST by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
What they find pornographic is the scourging and crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

Sick puppies, all of them, in their perverted perceptions.

Perhaps it's "the other realm" working through them, as Mel might put it.

Nothing else to do but pray for them.

26 posted on 03/06/2004 7:31:51 AM PST by kstewskis ( "The Passion of The Christ" is here....and no I'm NOT giving up Mel for Lent!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson