There's nothing in my posts about being "submissive" that I recall, although submissiveness is important in some matters for believers. Which evidence in the links in post #57 did you find offensive? If the feminists who run the sites linked to have changed any of their pages to offensive material (other than the usual feminist speech), I would like to know in order to link elsewhere in those instances.
...maybe the cites to research reports in the following?
http://familyops.us/columns/lemasters/Driving_the_Divorce_Rate.html ...or the evidence of Susan B. Anthony's nature in the links behind this one? Some of those links are to original documents transcribed to the Web.
http://familyops.us/anthonyproject/ Others have been incorporating some of the sources into further work for some time, so the effort won't be going away.
...or the evidence that socialist writers and leaders said that feminism is necessary to socialism?
http://www.marx.org/archive/marx/works/subject/women/index.htm Karl Marx On Women and Frederick Engels
Mao's Little Red Book on Women
http://www.paulnoll.com/China/Documents/Mao-31-Women.html Some of Lenin's words on women
http://www.marx.org/archive/lenin/works/1919/nov/06.htm Some of the local left/liberal people employed by the State here have had us vandalized, harrassed, threatened, and have disrupted our personal communications just recently over the Susan B. material. My family and I have been threatened, falsely accused (exonerated from all), cheated, vandalized, fired from employment and all that in the past by male and female feminists.
Some of my friends have received the same sorts of threats and harrassment from feminists. Feminism is offensive to us.
"Did you forget the sarcasm tag"
How about if I just clarify it. By "rival gangs," I was referring to the Democrats and our politicians' complicity in unconstitutional Democrat anti-family laws. Unfortunately, both of our parties are trying to entertain feminism against good family policy, and feminism makes a country more easily adaptable to socialism. Feminism, in turn, requires socialism in order to survive. Republicans as well as Democrats have voted in favor of and passed some very expensive feminist laws and funding to entice more women to divorce. Divorcing women and their lawyers have nearly absolute but unconstitutional power under the divorce industry to ruin their husbands (even the good ones) with nothing more than accusations in order to separate children and money from their husbands. Here's one instance.
Republicans, Something You Didn't Know - What Happened to Your Second Amendment Rights (EJF)by Dr. Charles E. Corry
http://familyops.us/columns/corry/What_Happened_to_Your_Second_Amendment_Rights.html See the info behind the links I presented in the last post.
And as for "sarcasm," yes, I meant to convey criticism and scorn regarding current divorce policy. All should become aware of what is likely to happen if we continue to aid no-fault divorce and the divorce industry. That is, with the fact that most divorced/cohabiting/hook-up singles tend to vote left/liberal, we could end up with Democrats running this country for several decades.