Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
Tennessee is not the issue. The families have a deeded easement leading from a public road in Tennessee into and across their property. The state of Tennessee acknoledges this easement. However, the Madison County in Alabama claims the easement doesn't exist even though it is recorded in Alabama. There is much more to this than property easements and house numbers. Please see my post number nine discussing the involvement of the Land Trust Of North Alabama and Huntsville.
10 posted on 03/06/2004 7:35:08 PM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke
Thanks, it makes more sense now. From the article, something didn't add up other than simple bureaucratic disinterest.

Is there any way of establishing that conflict of interest? Seems such would render the attorney liable to be sued and both the County and the Land Trust with him. Thems are some deep pockets, especially if you can identify the foundations funding the trust. When they've got more to lose than you do there is opportunity to get something to shake loose.

What might be the profit interest supporting that non-profit trust (there almost always is one)? Are there any mineral resources in that area? Water rights?
12 posted on 03/06/2004 7:44:52 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson