To: beaureguard
I just don't believe this panzy crap. I don't know a single republican who is angry at Bush over Iraq, except that he lost the WMD debate and should have been more politically savvy. The ONLY republicans I know who are honestly considering not voting for Bush are mad at him because of his stand on immigration and social spending.
Any life long registered republicans who think Bush should've delegated Iraq to the UN needs to go out and register democrat. At least that'd make them honest idiots.
49 posted on
03/08/2004 8:14:33 AM PST by
thedugal
(I is a genious.)
To: thedugal
He lost the WMD debate? What debate? Over 450,000 bodies were found in mass graves in Iraq last year, Saddam was a WMD. While stuck in a diplomatic quagmire for 14 months Iraq was busy hiding WMD's and exporting WMD's to Syria and Iran, details to be uncovered later, we are still looking. Since the Iraq War Libya has openly disclosed it's nuclear and chemical weapons programs and is willing to abandon them. Since the Iraq War a nuclear scientist from Pakistan has come forward with information of illegal transfers of technology to Iran and other evil regimes. None of this would have happend if not for Bush having the courage to do what others were only willing to threaten to do. Now, what WMD debate did President Bush lose?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson