Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yoe
So the media is who kept on asking "Why Bush hasn't gotten Bin Laden" is now saying when they get him it won't matter???????

Wrong, really wrong. When Saddam Hussein meekly surrendered the Arab world went into mourning over his capture and his lack of resistance, to the point of denial. Iraqi resistance against the coalition has been subdued in a major way.

4 posted on 03/09/2004 7:06:54 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pfflier
So the media is who kept on asking "Why Bush hasn't gotten Bin Laden" is now saying when they get him it won't matter???????

This guy said nothing like that.

10 posted on 03/09/2004 7:30:41 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier
So the media is who kept on asking "Why Bush hasn't gotten Bin Laden" is now saying when they get him it won't matter???????

This is not what he is saying. He is saying the world needs to fight militant Islam, which causes terrorism. Going after terrorism will not be enough, one has to go at the root. So getting Bin Laden will not stop this terrorism.

19 posted on 03/10/2004 1:16:19 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson