To: Jeff Gannon
According to the Washington Post article on your web site, you were the only person to even acknowledge the memo's existence. You referenced the memo specifically, i.e. a document--- are you suggesting you would like to have phrased that question differently like "reports suggest your wife..."?
If it is your claim that you never saw the memo, then it must have been someone you trusted who told you about what the memo said, fair? I mean, you are the only person on record stating knowledge that this memo actually exists and you wish to be thought of as a reputable journalist don't you?
And yet you claim you don't know why you might be relevant to the case?
That is simply unconvincing. You know why you are involved and you are probably none too happy with the people or person who got you into this mess, yet I suspect you probably have a pretty good grasp that you are "expendable."
Liddy was a stand-up guy and a patriot, but he was also a felon.
28 posted on
03/09/2004 1:04:33 PM PST by
JohnGalt
(What tale will serve me here among Mine angry and defrauded young? -- R. Kipling)
To: JohnGalt
You are so far off the mark on this, but I won't suggest you stop, since you reveal yourself to others who might be following this thread.
I will ask you to stop making judgements about my "reputation", however. It is unseemly and beyond what I consider appropriate in this forum.
Further, I have no desire to convince you of anything, especially since I sense that you have some self-righteous theory on the subject. Besides that, you are completely wrong.
29 posted on
03/09/2004 1:26:47 PM PST by
Jeff Gannon
(Listen to my radio show "Jeff Gannon's Washington" on www.RIGHTALK.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson