To: alnitak
Think about this, assuming the universe is fairly regular, (and that this view isn't peering into some dense area of the universe and the rest is not nearly as populated), we are looking at one twelve-point-seven millionth of the sky. And we are seeing some 10,000 galaxies (which themselves consist of BILLIONS of stars each). What is 10,000 multiplied by 12.7 million?
The numbers are beyond staggering.
7 posted on
03/09/2004 11:34:38 AM PST by
Paradox
(In the future, everyone will be Hitler for 15 minutes.)
To: Paradox
Obviously the light hasn't reached us and that's why they need such a magnifing glass to see it.
8 posted on
03/09/2004 11:35:22 AM PST by
kjam22
To: Paradox
Did a little math:
Just using this sparse area as a sample, with 10,000 galaxies in it, yields 127,000,000,000,000 galaxies.
There are an estimated 200 Billion stars in our galaxy alone. I guess that's a good average number to use for this.
200 Billion times 127,000,000,000,000 yields 25,400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 potential stars out there in the sky, and who knows how many planets orbiting them.
Now if John Kerry could just figure out how to tax all of them, there would be no deficit, and everyone in the US could have free health care. Kumbaya.
17 posted on
03/09/2004 11:55:03 AM PST by
flashbunny
(Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed.)
To: Paradox
It implies there are about as many stars in the universe as there are atoms in a glass of water. There is an intervening step at least as big, between a glass of water and a typical star.
29 posted on
03/09/2004 12:59:05 PM PST by
JasonC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson