1 posted on
03/10/2004 2:33:29 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
"New approach?" Sound like the same old Salon.com to me!
2 posted on
03/10/2004 2:35:02 AM PST by
NYCVirago
To: kattracks
The Republican National Committee was quick to rebut Salon.com's new approach. Spokeswoman Mary Ellen Grant questioned whether people would take the website seriously with Blumenthal overseeing news content. Here's what I would have said -- nobody to the right of Susan Sarandon took them seriously in the first place!
3 posted on
03/10/2004 2:36:25 AM PST by
NYCVirago
To: kattracks
Here's the last financial item on Salon's finances. It seems the media even accepts the money pit vampire that is Salon, as there's been a dearth of articles about it.
Less Than Ten Cents on the Dollar ( Salon.com owes the White House $, can't pay )
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1090449/posts
4 posted on
03/10/2004 2:39:58 AM PST by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Proud member of the right wing extremist Neanderthals.)
To: All
Sidney Blumenthal, a former aide to President Bill Clinton...Oh, fer Gawd's sake- Sid the Squid?
various links | 7-27-02 | The Heavy Equipment Guy
5 posted on
03/10/2004 2:41:07 AM PST by
backhoe
(Has that Clinton "legacy" made you feel safer yet?)
To: kattracks
An attack on Bush, and that's supposed to be their new tack?
I thought when you retool a business you're supposed to have a better revenue plan. Am I to understand their new plan is to take with the Democrats?
If they win they lose. If they lose they lose. What motive can I be missing? Are they a business or are they just staving off dissolvement?
It starts to make me dwell on the observations of detective Sherlock Holmes. To wit: "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
6 posted on
03/10/2004 3:38:41 AM PST by
Tredge
(Don't ask me, I don't know)
To: kattracks
This stuff will only resonate with the 'Hate-Bush' crowd, who are already nuts. Big deal.
7 posted on
03/10/2004 3:54:05 AM PST by
atomicpossum
(Fun pics in my profile)
To: kattracks
LOL.....oh Sidney Blumenthal, of Monica's a stalker fame!
Didn't he warn Tony Blair not to support President Bush's stance on the war against terror?
8 posted on
03/10/2004 4:04:56 AM PST by
OldFriend
(Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
To: kattracks
Salon is being kept alive through the next election by infusions of leftist cash, loans and credit. The new liberal radio talk netword, ditto.
This is how liberals are getting around campaign finance laws. Every ounce of left-wing gold is being thrown in every way possible into winning the White House in November.
Should President Bush win, the liberal propaganda organs will wither away and die. They are kept viable right now as part of the desperate Democrat/socialist/commie/liberal/leftist effort to win in November.
Leni
9 posted on
03/10/2004 4:15:19 AM PST by
MinuteGal
(Register now for "FReeps Ahoy 3" . A week of fun, food, freeperistics, starting in the low $700's!)
To: kattracks
"Despite being viewed by 3 million people each month and having 74,000 paid subscribers, the website has struggled financially and has a debt of more than $80 million, according a New York Times report in January."Where do they get these viewer numbers?
How many people view FreeRepublic, how many registered viewers/contributors do we have, and how much cash do we burn through each year to support that?
12 posted on
03/10/2004 4:57:34 AM PST by
SW6906
To: kattracks
Salon.com? I thought that craphole was on the way out and dying.
14 posted on
03/10/2004 6:11:36 AM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(If you can read this...you're too close.)
To: kattracks
17 posted on
03/10/2004 6:15:57 AM PST by
Samwise
(I am going to need to be sedated before this election is over.)
To: kattracks
the first in a series of articles planned under the direction of Sidney Blumenthal, a former aide to President Bill Clinton. First lie, Sid 'Grassy Knoll' Blumenthal never worked for Bill, he was always Hillary's creature.
"This disturbing report from the Bush Pentagon, and others that will follow, are part of Salon's new emphasis - what we call 'Unintimidated News,' " Blumenthal said in a statement.
Try 'Unmitigated Bile'.
Never forget that Warnock of Adobe and Jobs of Apple and a third character from Hambrick and Quist set up Salon originally to help defend Clinton in the year of Lewinski.
At least Sid is openly working for them now, back then he just fed them oppositioin research direct from Hillary and the White House.
19 posted on
03/10/2004 6:58:31 AM PST by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson