Replies

So you're Plaisted? That's who got the email on that date. If you are, shame on you for writing such trash! If you aren't, shame on you for impersonating someone else and artificially inflating your resume.

You got your text from here, all of it.

Apparently on the same day in Feb, 1998,, one Arthur V. Chadwick posted this:

http://www.asa3.org/archive/ASA/199802/0170.html

on a forum for religious scientists. He seems not to have published his criticisms where real science will ever see them. Since this is him, here, associated with this site, he probably would have pushed this harder if he thought he had anything.

Just a veiled mumble from someone who would like to undercut Ferguson but has nothing to publish.

So you're Plaisted?

No, of course not.

You got your text from here, all of it.

Of course I did. I used quotation marks and the word [snip] to indicate exactly that, and I linked the source so that you would see exactly where it came from. Which makes me wonder why you asked me if I'm Plaisted. (?)

Apparently on the same day in Feb, 1998,, one Arthur V. Chadwick posted this:

http://www.asa3.org/archive/ASA/199802/0170.html

Plaisted gives the link in my linked article to you as: "http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/faq/radiocarbon.shtml:" (the link does not work)

The colon at the end of the aforesaid link in the Plaisted article indicates that what follows is a QUOTATION from the link. Therefore Chadwick is the source. You are correct about that, but there is nothing sinister or unethical about it, either from me or from Plaisted.

Cordially,