[orionblamblam]

> So you have not proved anything by claiming that science cannot prove evolution has not happened.

Sure. But that, as you are aware, was not the main claim in support of evolution. It is dishonest of you to suggest that it was, when the actual quote was: "So far, all the verifiable evidence regarding evolution has either supported it... or modified it... nothing yet refutes it."

Evolution is supported, not refuted. Creationism is refuted, but not supported.

>It would be better if someone could prove it possible...

It's been seen to happen, and within a span of decades. New species emerge. Game over.

[vessel]

>It's been seen to happen, and within a span of decades. New species emerge. Game over.

By assexual or self-fertilizing reproductive methods in plants and maybe in flies. Often times, Colchicine induced mutations.

Cite one vertebrate, get a point.

Your turn.

Your failure supports creation science.