Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vessel; Ichneumon
Remember it's a drawing, a hypothetical case.

Now you're just dodging. Everything it illustrates there is a real kind of feature, you just don't find absolutely all of them together that way. Here's a real case, lacking some--only some--of the volcanic intrusion stuff but otherwise presenting the same problems.

From this site.

You have not addressed how the heck you get all that out of one flood. I'll pile on a bit, then I've got to go. Freeper Ichneumon once made a nice post highlighting the problems with interpreting the Grand Canyon layers as flood sediments. I like to borrow it, as it's perfect for times like this.

Non-pillow lava would be formed before being deluged, and after waters recede before subsequent secondary overflow, ie: tides of mud. Entirely within Biblical framework.

There are non-pillow lavas all up and down. Nobody can find a global flood anywhere. Local floods, yes. In all eras. One big flood, no. No such ever.

I'll check back in a few hours.

189 posted on 03/12/2004 4:33:31 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
> You have not addressed how the heck you get all that out of one flood.

Yes I did, exaclty the same mechanics but shorter time than you would suggest, in order to prevent erosion which is not there, just add water and sand moves a lot.

Mix in a little limestone and you get concrete. Lot's of heat too. But do it quick or it will set in one big lump and won't spread out in nice layers. After a little while if you want a special effect, bend it break it and pour some more in to the cracks or press down and let it squeeze up from below. Be creative.
193 posted on 03/12/2004 4:52:00 PM PST by vessel (How long has your candle been burning? Only you and the light know for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: VadeRetro
> Ichneumon once made a nice post highlighting the problems with interpreting the Grand Canyon layers as flood sediments. I like to borrow it, as it's perfect for times like this.

The critics of creationism on that post are very confused, an the proponents a bit as well, I must admit.

The Grand Canyon could have had the uplifts as described by old earth geologists, but as I assert, during a short period of global upheaval and after a global flood had recently made a massive deposit of sand. This deposit could have then been cut out by a subsequent local event on the scale of one of the Great Lakes Bursting through an earthen dam. Really just a post storm puddle in the new mountains, maybe not even a sustainable from local drainage. This could gouge out the sand stone very quickly and wash all of the sediment out onto the high sea, no delta. This fits. The absence of a delta does not fit with millenia of erosion.

195 posted on 03/12/2004 6:11:20 PM PST by vessel (How long has your candle been burning? Only you and the light know for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson