To: DannyTN
26 posted on
03/10/2004 7:32:26 AM PST by
ThinkPlease
(Fortune Favors the Bold!)
To: ThinkPlease
modern humans of that era..." Found in a slurry of ancient cave bear dung.
27 posted on
03/10/2004 7:40:12 AM PST by
balrog666
(Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.)
To: ThinkPlease
I see your link.
Between ICR's finding and the evolutionists response that contamination is common, it certainly undermines much of the credibiliity of carbon dating.
One begins to wonder whether any of the carbon dating is accurate. If old fossils can be contaiminated, then surely new fossils can be contaminated. How many other radiometric dating methods suffer from similar problems?
33 posted on
03/10/2004 8:03:42 AM PST by
DannyTN
To: ThinkPlease
Many of the "Responses" to creationist claims refer to a the panacea of "reservoir effect".
The problem is that pre-flood or even pre-ice age C-14 production and ingestion was very possibly much lower than post-flood, or even post ice age.
What could have caused it to be lower?
Waters above the earth shielding the earth and inhabitants from the cosmic bombardment which produces C-14.
What could have contributed to giant ferns able to support themselves? Waters above the earth causing a higher barometric pressure and thus increasing turgidity (a plant's internal pressure).
Now that's a "resevoir effect" that may answer some questions.
68 posted on
03/10/2004 11:05:13 AM PST by
vessel
(How long has your candle been burning? Only you and the light know for sure.)
To: ThinkPlease
Outstanding Link. Thank You, and bookmarked.
121 posted on
03/10/2004 8:23:39 PM PST by
MilspecRob
(Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson