Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kraft bonuses: $10M amid layoffs
CNN Money ^ | March 6, 2004: 5:22 PM EST | Reuters

Posted on 03/10/2004 9:52:55 AM PST by blowfish

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:59 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Food maker has to lay off 6,000 workers and close 20 plants, but execs still got paid big bonuses.

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Bonuses totaling more than $10 million were paid out to five Kraft Foods Inc. executives at the end of 2003, even as the giant food maker made plans to lay off thousands of workers.


(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kraft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
No comment required...
1 posted on 03/10/2004 9:52:55 AM PST by blowfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blowfish
If they laid off a dozen useless top managers, they'd save as much money as they would by firing 6,000 workers.

This reminds me of what happened to the Hathaway shirt factory in Maine. The Conglomerate Vice President in Charge of Downsizing was paid twice as much as the annual deficit at that factory when it was closed.
2 posted on 03/10/2004 9:57:11 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blowfish
Jeez, imagine the bonuses if the company was actually performing well. Stands to reason, though, that they have some extra cash to toss to the bigwigs since there are so many littlewigs they don't have to pay anymore.
3 posted on 03/10/2004 9:57:16 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blowfish
It's really hard to be on the side of big business with stuff like this going on.
4 posted on 03/10/2004 9:57:36 AM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
There is something conceptually wrong with paying top management large bonuses for massive reductions in headcount. Why do you think they call them "human resources"?
5 posted on 03/10/2004 9:59:56 AM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blowfish
Let them eat cheese...
6 posted on 03/10/2004 10:00:33 AM PST by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
You should never be on the side of big business unless it's also somehow the side of America's interests. Businesses are global citizens and push globalist agendas, which is their right.
7 posted on 03/10/2004 10:00:37 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blowfish
So.... why again are they receiving this bonus? I though you receive a bonus as a reward for excellence in management. I understand the need of lay-offs and downsizing, but I can't justify rewarding people for laying-off their employees.
8 posted on 03/10/2004 10:01:16 AM PST by Bismarck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blowfish
Kraft said the plan aimed to focus executives on the achievement of long-term financial and strategic goals that have a positive impact on stockholder returns.

A long term business goal can be rather bizarre, apparently.

It is easy to see where some leftists come from. If you get fired from a job where you know your own value so some suit can look like a hero for cutting costs, it has got to make you bitter.

A lot of this sort of nonsense has to do with our byzantine tax code.

9 posted on 03/10/2004 10:01:28 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
I hate the term human resources, I am a man not a lump of coal. I liked it better when it was simply called the personnel office.
10 posted on 03/10/2004 10:05:51 AM PST by TXBSAFH (KILL-9 needs no justification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bismarck
Big layoffs usually mean a few upticks for the stock, which means the board's stock options are worth more, which is why the reward the executives with big bonuses. Its all short-term gain kind of stuff. By the time the chickens come home to roost, everybody's fat and happy with their golden parachutes, and its somebody else's problem.
11 posted on 03/10/2004 10:06:32 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Businesses are global citizens and push globalist agendas, which is their right.

Can you explain to me how a business has rights? From whence do they come?

12 posted on 03/10/2004 10:07:40 AM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
It's really hard to be on the side of big business with stuff like this going on.

Yes, it is. The telecommunication company I worked for(an affiliate) downsized 2/3s of the company a few months ago, myself included. However, the CFO, COO etc, (who got us into financial staits in the first place), were still getting their six figure bonuses when I left. Oh well, noone said life was fair.

13 posted on 03/10/2004 10:08:02 AM PST by LisaMalia (In Memory of Sgt. James W. Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH
I hate the term human resources, I am a man not a lump of coal.

I'll come back to your comment later.

14 posted on 03/10/2004 10:08:19 AM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bismarck
Life's not fair. No need to buy the stock if you don't think the company is being run well.

Corporations must be permitted to do what's in their shareholders (owners) best interest. If the owners don't like it, they can vote with their feet.
15 posted on 03/10/2004 10:12:11 AM PST by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
This is the European model of placing divisions of the parent company in competition with each other, basing bonuses on how much they save the company. If you close the location and lay off the workers in an marginally profitable venue, you maximize your bonus and get to move on to do the same at another location.
16 posted on 03/10/2004 10:13:55 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blowfish
No comment required...

Yes there is, it's called corruption and the bonuses should be cancelled. Where are the shareholdere?

17 posted on 03/10/2004 10:14:27 AM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneTimeLurker
Fair enough... We shouldn't worry too much about what is fair, but what actually works. Nevertheless, I do think that bonuses should reward excellence in management and NOT a short-term raise in stock price. But, it's up to Kraft's stockholders to accept or reject these policies.
18 posted on 03/10/2004 10:17:09 AM PST by Bismarck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blowfish
If you require immediate assistance or would like to speak to a representative from Kraft Foods, please call us at 1-800-323-0768 with questions about our products Monday through Friday between the hours of 9am - 9pm EST.

Or you can write to us at:

Kraft Foods Inc.
Consumer Resource and Information Center
1 Kraft Court
Glenview, IL 60025

19 posted on 03/10/2004 10:19:48 AM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bismarck
So.... why again are they receiving this bonus? I though you receive a bonus as a reward for excellence in management. I understand the need of lay-offs and downsizing, but I can't justify rewarding people for laying-off their employees.

One word, GREED. And because they can. My raises were based on my job performance, productivity, etc. Upper management in most cases, don't go by these guidelines. They can run a company into virtual bankrupcy, and still come out smelling like very expensive roses.

20 posted on 03/10/2004 10:20:30 AM PST by LisaMalia (In Memory of Sgt. James W. Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson