Replies

As I said, David Kay concluded nothing. He went to Iraq. Confirmed and denied nothing. He cut the baby in half and called wash, then split so he could say he did his job and not be overly criticized by either side. It was a brilliant equivocation. A masterpiece of ambiguity. And if you want to worship at Kay's feet, knock yourself out.

As for "who" in the military (re your previous comment), I'll start with my own daughter who is a Chemical warfare specialist attached to a military intelligence unit currently in Iraq, and those she works with.

My own credentials are my experience as a Military Intelligence officer (something I'm sure you'll think humorous), and the research I've done on the subject.

I've offered you specifics, and even a link to further research. You've offered nothing but aspersions and non-specific references to the Kay report. If it makes you feel better to say I've been duped, good for you. But anyone reading this exchange will be able figure out who the real dupe is.

Adios. I have better things to do than waste any further time with you on this subject. Say hi to your friends at DU for me.