... This is how the Dems are portraying Bush against KerryThis is how Meek portrays Kerry versus Bush:
_________________________________________________
So what I have to say to him is ...
Posted on 03/12/2004 10:32:07 AM PST by doug from upland
I saw on one of these threads yesterday more debunking of those Winter Soldier witnesses that you claimed have not been exposed.
Are you sure it was you Ox?
We don't know what your voice sounds like. You could be on salary with the Kerry team for all we know!
:~)
Yeah last time I checked I was me.
I agree with you 100%
Trust me, people have DIED - many people - for less incriminating information than what these two have on Kerry.
I don't know where the bodies are buried in Faggachusetts, but there are plenty of graves in Arkansas of people who did not put Clinton in good light while he was gubner or president.
I hope thses guys are getting good counsel on this - it is more series than you might think.
... This is how the Dems are portraying Bush against KerryThis is how Meek portrays Kerry versus Bush:
_________________________________________________
So what I have to say to him is ...
Check is in the mail.
All I did was reference this thread as a matter of great interest to him.
You did the leg work - Ya Dun Good!
Here's the article. One supporter who said Kerry attended now says his memory may be wrong (surprise!):
-----------------------
'71 anti-war session: Was Kerry in KC?
On at least one point the recollections align: A 1971 Kansas City meeting of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War was marred by talk — shouted down by a disgusted majority — of assassinating pro-war politicians.
Members of the group that John Kerry propelled to the center of the anti-war movement and that helped launch his political career do not agree, however, whether the man now on course to the Democratic presidential nomination was around for the debate.
At least one enthusiastic Kerry supporter said he remembered him attending at least the start of the group's national steering committee meeting and urging the organization to distance itself from radicals.
“John said, … I think his exact words were, ‘You guys are getting way too radical, you're defeating your purpose, and I quit,' ” Randy Barnes said Friday.
A Kansas Citian and an active volunteer this year for Kerry's presidential run, Barnes said upon reflection later in the day that he could “not be absolutely certain” that Kerry was in Kansas City for the meeting.
Others, including the veteran who had proposed the idea of violence at the meeting, think Kerry had left the organization before it gathered at various Kansas City locations in the fall of 1971.
“My recollection was that he wasn't there,” said Scott Camil, a disabled Marine veteran living in Gainesville, Fla.
At the time, Camil said, he thought severe action was needed to end the war, and he argued for a “domestic Phoenix Project” modeled after attempts by U.S. forces to make Viet Cong leaders targets for assassination.
“I thought that when the Congress is not doing what we want them to do, you change things. As a Marine sergeant in Vietnam I was conditioned to think you went after the head of the snake,” Camil said.
“I'm sorry about those discussions now, but they did take place. … I had no cause ever to discuss those plans with John Kerry.”
He disputed an article published Friday in The New York Sun that said specific senators were targets and that attempts were made to parcel out killings. Camil said the talk never got that far.
“It did not float at all,” Camil said. “I took a lot of (criticism) from the guys there for bringing it up.”
John Hurley, who runs the Kerry campaign's veterans operation, said he spoke to Kerry on Friday night. “There was no way” he attended the Kansas City meeting, Hurley said. “He was not there.”
In Tour of Duty, a largely sympathetic book about Kerry's war record and anti-war activism, author Douglas Brinkley wrote that the senator from Massachusetts did not attend the Kansas City meeting.
The book cites a Nov. 10 resignation letter saying that Kerry had been proud to work for the group but that he was leaving it because of “personality conflicts and differences in political philosophy.”
By the book's chronology, the Kansas City meetings began two days later. Those contacted for this story could not recall the precise dates of the gathering.
In his book Home to War, A History of the Vietnam Veterans Movement, Gerald Nicosia writes that Kerry resigned from the organization at its St. Louis meeting in July 1971.
John Musgrave said he attended the fall 1971 meeting in Kansas City, his first Vietnam Veterans Against the War session as Kansas state coordinator. He said he remembered Kerry attending as well.
“There was never any serious consideration of it (Camil's proposal against politicians) at all,” Musgrave said. “It went over like a lead balloon.”
He still respects Camil but said he was impulsive at the time and angered other members of the group by raising what they considered to be an absurd and ugly idea.
As for Kerry, Musgrave said he remembered him talking to the veterans about protecting the group's credibility.
“He said, ‘It's people like you who are going to hurt the credibility of the organization,” Musgrave said. “(Kerry) may have resigned shortly after that meeting or at that meeting, I don't know. …We were all aware that he was getting ready to run for some political office.”
Hurley said the speech Musgrave referred to came earlier in the year.
“I think he's confusing the St. Louis and the Kansas City meetings,” Hurley said.
~END~
In the New York Sun interview (Link at beginning of this thread titled "Thomas Lipscomb story") Camil told Lipscomb of the New York Sun:
Mr. Camil said he did not recall whether Mr. Kerry was at the Kansas City meeting nor did he recall whether he had discussed his assassination plan with Mr. Kerry.
In addition to Mr. Barnes’s recollection placing Mr. Kerry at the Kansas City meeting, another Vietnam veteran who attended the meeting, Terry Du-Bose, said that Mr. Kerry was there.
So we're up to three witnesses that Kerry was there.
-Barnes (who now claims a possibly faulty memory)
-DuBose from the original Sun article
-Musgrave from the Kansas City article
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
