[Skywarner]

"It was clear from the video that it was a high level AQ meeting with the leader (OBL) obviously present at the time. Although NBC did ask the question, "did Clinton let OBL slip away," they still had to throw in if Clinton, being hampered by scandal, prevented him from acting. It never seemed to hamper him in the past. It's about time they released this information that many have known about for some time."

Of course, if Clinton hadn't involved himself in a scandal - of his own making - perhaps he would have had more time for actually dealing with his duty to defend the nation.

[cwb]

What's amazing is how the media helps democrats look for any "out" that helps them explain their incompetence. As Meyer's admitted, she wasn't able to get a response from 3 top-rank Clinton officials that she sought out...and yet her response was exactly what we would've heard from them.

It is now clear that the 9/11 commisson set up to see what failures led to 9/11, must concentrate on this specific event. And the so-called victims of 9/11, that have been accusing Bush of all sorts of nefarious motives, must now be asked how they feel about this latest revelation. Will the media chase them down the same way they did to get their reaction on Bush's latest campaign ads? I doubt it.

[mo]

could'nt state it better....IMHO his conduct in the Oval Office defines "dereliction of duty" in the most professional sense.