Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British court rules Agassi owes $50K in taxes on endorsements
AP ^ | 03/17/04

Posted on 03/17/2004 10:40:38 AM PST by nypokerface

LONDON -- Andre Agassi was ordered Wednesday to pay British tax on income earned from endorsements, a ruling with implications for other sports.

Judge Sir Gavin Lightman of the London High Court said Agassi had to pay about $50,000 in taxes on income paid by Nike and Head Sports to his U.S.-based company Agassi Enterprises Inc.

British tax authorities argued that because Agassi spent time each year competing at Wimbledon and other tournaments in Britain, that activity was relevant to his endorsement earnings.

Agassi's lawyers had appealed a tax demand for the 1998-99 tax year.

But Lightman agreed with tax officials that Agassi was liable for tax on income connected to his activities in Britain, even if the paying and receiving companies had no tax presence here.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: agassi

1 posted on 03/17/2004 10:40:38 AM PST by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Andre's been my total favorite for so many years. I shall be heartbroken when he retires.
2 posted on 03/17/2004 10:55:05 AM PST by Concerto in D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Using this convoluted logic, isn't Agassi responsible for the U.K. taxes on ALL HIS EARNINGS in ALL TOURNAMENTS?
3 posted on 03/17/2004 10:59:33 AM PST by BikePacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BikePacker
I can't believe this. Has every other golfer, tennis player had to pay these taxes. Why would it matter what he earns in another country, that especially is not operating in that country. I can see paying taxes for any winnings he were to win in that country, but that would be it. They could go back to every player and back tax them on all of their earnings, no matter where they are from.
4 posted on 03/17/2004 11:10:50 AM PST by JBCiejka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JBCiejka
Wasn't this issue settled already. A little thing called the American Revolution?

Doesn't this amount to taxation without representation?

Why doesn't the U.S. government step in and say, "Excuse kind Barrister, but you would PLEASE LEAVE MY CITIZENS ALONE???"
5 posted on 03/18/2004 6:29:59 PM PST by Delta Dawn (The whole truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Damn...remind me never to go to the UK to pursue business leads.
6 posted on 03/18/2004 6:31:26 PM PST by krb (the statement on the other side of this tagline is false)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krb
... remind me never to go to the UK to pursue business leads.

Perhaps you want to start here in the good ol' US of A. Many cities tax athletes who are participants in professional sports, such as NFL football, when they play in their city. Same goes with entertainers. Doesn't matter if you're a visiting team ... or a entertainer doing a one night gig ... you pay.

7 posted on 03/18/2004 6:40:12 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
Dayum!
8 posted on 03/18/2004 6:46:23 PM PST by krb (the statement on the other side of this tagline is false)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson