Skip to comments.
CHENEY SLAMS 'WEAK' KERRY
New York Post ^
| 3/18/04
| DEBORAH ORIN
Posted on 03/18/2004 2:24:53 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:20:17 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
March 18, 2004 -- Vice President Dick Cheney yesterday ripped into Democratic nominee John Kerry as a weak waffler with lousy judgment who'd have left Saddam Hussein in power and is insulting steadfast allies like Britain. "It is not an impressive record for someone who aspires to become commander in chief in this time of testing for our country," Cheney said in a speech at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., after a bomb ripped through a Baghdad hotel.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cheney; gwb2004; issues; kerry; nationaldefense
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
To: Puzzleman
I watched Vice President Cheneys 30 minute address on C-SPAN 2 last night at 7:00 pm to 7:30 pm Central Time...I cannot find this speech on C-SPAN 2's web site in their video library or anywhere else. They do have speeches from yesterday and today by such luminaries as Maxine Waters and other talking heads, but they do not have Cheney's speech. I would like my friends to hear it.
Cordially,
41
posted on
03/18/2004 8:00:42 AM PST
by
Diamond
To: samtheman
How is simply stating a voting record an "attack ad"?attack ad (n) - any political advertisement by a Republican or conservative that does anything other than begging forgiveness for being a Republican or conservative
issue ad (n) - any political advertisement by a Democrat or liberal that blatantly mischaracterizes a position held by a Republican or conservative
42
posted on
03/18/2004 8:04:26 AM PST
by
kevkrom
(The John Kerry Songbook: www.imakrom.com/kerrysongs)
To: kattracks
43
posted on
03/18/2004 8:04:30 AM PST
by
petercooper
(I actually did vote for the $87 Billion, before I voted against it.)
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
Found this exchange of Cheney from May 2000 Meet the Press. Kind of odd to read now.
CHENEY: No Regrets On Keeping Saddam In Power In 1991US Would Have Had To Do It Alone
MR. RUSSERT: Do you regret not taking Saddam out nine years ago?
MR. CHENEY: I don't, Tim. It was--and it's been talked about since then. But the fact of the matter is, the only way you could have done that would be to go to Baghdad and occupy Iraq. If we'd done that, the U.S. would have been all alone. We would not have had the support of the coalition, especially of the Arab nations that fought alongside us in Kuwait. None of them ever set foot inside Iraq. Conversations I had with leaders in the region afterwards--they all supported the decision that was made not to go to Baghdad. They were concerned that we not get into a position where we shifted instead of being the leader of an international coalition to roll back Iraqi aggression to one in which we were an imperialist power, willy-nilly moving into capitals in that part of the world taking down governments. [Meet the Press, 8/27/00]
44
posted on
03/18/2004 2:16:39 PM PST
by
optik_b
(follow the money)
To: Diamond; rudy45
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson