To: PropheticZero
Wonder if the bot'll be "broken" if you try to lead the conversation instead of letting the bot steer you. Nearly anything passes the Turing test if you are completely passive, bad example.
11 posted on
03/18/2004 11:24:04 AM PST by
Nataku X
(Ich bin ein ultrakonservativen Aktivisten & I am a chocolate frosted donut.)
To: Nakatu X
"Wonder if the bot'll be "broken" if you try to lead the conversation instead of letting the bot steer you. Nearly anything passes the Turing test if you are completely passive, bad example." I wonder what it would do if you simply repeated back to it everything it "said"...
--Boris
13 posted on
03/18/2004 11:27:22 AM PST by
boris
(The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
To: Nakatu X
Wonder if the bot'll be "broken" if you try to lead the conversation instead of letting the bot steer you. Nearly anything passes the Turing test if you are completely passive, bad example. A realated question might be if a Paedophile is more apt to take a passive or an active role in the conversation.
If they tend to stay for the most part passive, slowly weedling information then the bot may or may not work.
However if they are for the most part the most active part of the conversation and this bot can't handle it then it's usefullness is degraded.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson