Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study Funded by U.S.EPA (During Clinton Admin.) on Population Growth/Control (Targets Catholics)
http://www.acunu.org/millennium/popul.html ^ | 1990's | Millenium Project - various

Posted on 03/18/2004 5:30:31 PM PST by King Black Robe

RESULTS OF POPULATION

DELPHI ROUNDS I and II


In the first round, the panelists were asked to rate some forces that led to the reduction of the world population growth rate from 2.06% in the late 1960s to 1.7% currently and to assess how these forces might change over the next 25 years. They were invited to add forces, which were rated in the second round by the same Scale A below.


Table 1: orders these forces by their historic influence

Table 2: orders them by their future influence.


Scale A

Historic Influence

1 = Very Important
2 = Important
3 = Marginally important
4 = Unimportant
5 = Counter impact

Future Influence

1 = Greatly increasing in importance
2 = Increasing in importance
3 = Remaining the same in importance
4 = Decreasing in importance
5 = No longer a factor, or mixed


Table 1 - The importance of some HISTORIC factors on global population growth



Table 2 - The importance of some forces affecting population over the NEXT 25 years



In the first round, the panelists were asked to rate some forces the could explain why populations rates have remained relatively high in the developing countries and to assess how these forces might change over the next 25 years. They were invited to add forces, which were rated in the second round by the same Scale A above.


Table 3: orders these forces by their historic influence;

Table 4: orders them by their future influence.


Table 3 - Some reasons for high population growth in developing countries


Table 4 - How important will these forces be over the NEXT 25 years?



The panelists were asked to assess new forces and unprecedented events that might influence population growth in the future and suggest and assess additional such forces as to their likelihood of occurrence and impacts over the next 25 years using Scale B.


Table 5:shows the average of the panel's responses about their likelihood;

Table 6: shows their impacts over the next 25 years.


Scale B

Likelihood of occurrence

1 = almost certain
2 = likely
3 = even or 50/50 chance
4 = unlikely
5 = almost impossible

Eventual impact on population within the next 25 years of growth

1 = reduces growth rate by 30% or more
2 = reduces growth rate by 5-30%
3 = no impact
4 = increases growth rate by 5-30%
5 = increases growth rate by 30% or more


Table 5 - Likelihood of occurrence of new forces or unprecedented events that might influence future population growth.



Table 6 - Eventual impact of these new forces and unprecedented events on population growth over the next 25 years.



With the information provided by the panel in round I, we identified two possible future events that were judged to be unlikely, but nevertheless potentially effective in reducing population growth rates, if they were to occur. Both have been considered before and one is the focus of large international programs. Without repeating what has been said and tried many times, we asked for suggestions about novel policy approaches that might be practical, and if implemented, improve the probability of these developments. A distillation of those suggestions follow:


1.4.1 Novel policies that could lead to a social norm of two children per family throughout the majority of the developing world:


  1. Novel policies that could lead to the Vatican's acceptance of contraception without limit:


1.4.3. Other policy areas of your selection and how you would address it:


Hand Millennium Project Home Page

Hand Issues Report index


Last Updated:


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: birthcontrol; catholiclist; catholics; clintonadmin; homosexuality; pope; poporg; populationcontrol; populationgrowth; stevemosher; stevenmosher
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: NYer
Bishops call for Vatican III

Haven't these people done enough damage already?

41 posted on 03/18/2004 11:20:42 PM PST by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: King Black Robe
Horrified bump
42 posted on 03/18/2004 11:21:41 PM PST by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
Novel policies that could lead to the Vatican's acceptance of contraception without limit:

Theological doctrine developed by U.S. Catholic Bishops in support of sustainable development (of Government Statements at UNCED 1992).
Create philosophical shift among powerful within the Roman Catholic Church.



I've been giving this more thought. Considering the policies, collection recipients and political inclinations of American bishops the authors have achieved some success.
43 posted on 03/18/2004 11:22:12 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: King Black Robe
"But I thought they believed that homosexuals were born that way...."

"Really! Certainly exposes that theory as a phony one."

Are they planning on adding something relative to this in the water as well?
44 posted on 03/19/2004 4:04:26 AM PST by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: King Black Robe
Pretty much this work is a re-run of the Rockefeller stuff from the 1960's.

IIRC, President Nixon bought into a chunk of this crap, too, and issued some PDDs to facilitate the conclusions.

Nixon was a real jackass and the Rockefeller family is on the "permanent suspects" list I keep.
45 posted on 03/19/2004 4:58:24 AM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: King Black Robe
Unofficially, PRChina is killing off children left and right. It's not "female babies:"--it's ANY baby after the first one born to a couple.

The couples make the decision to knock off female children because only a SON is obligated to support his parents in their old age.
46 posted on 03/19/2004 5:00:39 AM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTT!!!!!!
47 posted on 03/19/2004 5:25:01 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1; xsmommy; secret garden
Check out this report by the enemy within.
48 posted on 03/19/2004 5:49:43 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Hey John F'in. Kerry, why the long face?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
In order to stabilize world population, it is necessary to eliminate 350,000 people a day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it." - Oceanographer Jaques Cousteau Published

And he was buried out of Notre Dame in Paris. The church is not a social club, Jacques, whereever you are.
49 posted on 03/19/2004 6:18:15 AM PST by Desdemona (Music Librarian and provider of cucumber sandwiches, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary. Hats required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
I think these people read Brave New World by Aldous Huxley way too many times.

Either that or he was a prophet.
50 posted on 03/19/2004 6:21:58 AM PST by Desdemona (Music Librarian and provider of cucumber sandwiches, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary. Hats required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
Pretty much this work is a re-run of the Rockefeller stuff from the 1960's.

60's? Go back farther than that. It was before 1910 that John D. Rockefeller went to visit Pope Pius XI, I think (I get the Piuses confused sometimes), and Rocky asked him to change the Catholic position. From that little episode, we got an encyclical warning against modernism. That sort of backfired for the Rockefellers.
51 posted on 03/19/2004 6:26:50 AM PST by Desdemona (Music Librarian and provider of cucumber sandwiches, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary. Hats required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
They have achieved success, to be sure. The USCCB's beaurocracy is laden with lackeys of Hillary Clinton and the shadow forces that make themselves known through "population control" and through the obvious nefarious administration of the church by certain bishops themselves. We had a few good threads on FR at one time exposing people working at the USCCB who were actually Party workers of the Democratic party or were paid lobbyists of far left anti-Catholic organizations. There was one recently, but I cannot find it through "Search".
52 posted on 03/19/2004 7:50:39 AM PST by Siobhan (+Pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
""In order to stabilize world population, it is necessary to eliminate 350,000 people a day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it." - Oceanographer Jaques Cousteau Published in the Courier, a publication of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)"

I suppose that explains why birth rates in a number of developed countries are now below the replacement rate.

Why don't these whackos look at the real world and see what's happening?
53 posted on 03/19/2004 8:00:01 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
In order to stabilize world population, it is necessary to eliminate 350,000 people a day.

Okay. I propose that environmentalists, liberals, socialists, communinsts and homosexuals to go first in the elimination process. Let me know when we run out.

54 posted on 03/19/2004 8:14:09 AM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus; NYer; CAtholic Family Association; Salvation; Siobhan
Well, we know how dangerous we Catholics are. Some of us are mini-population explosions contained just in one house!
55 posted on 03/19/2004 8:21:09 AM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Yes, indeed, Hermann!!!!
56 posted on 03/19/2004 8:39:53 AM PST by Siobhan (+Pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
2.7 Doubling, worldwide, of today's level of male and female homosexuality

Ping

57 posted on 03/19/2004 9:29:47 AM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
I had forgotten about that early visit.

I know that Rocky Jr went to see Paul VI before Humanae was issued, and also seduced Notre Dame U to hold a big conference on the topic (with a few hundred thou, of course...)
58 posted on 03/19/2004 9:32:00 AM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: dsc
Why don't these whackos look at the real world and see what's happening?

Because they want their cake and to eat it too.

They also don't want to believe they were duped.
59 posted on 03/19/2004 9:35:38 AM PST by Desdemona (Music Librarian and provider of cucumber sandwiches, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary. Hats required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Some of us are mini-population explosions contained just in one house!

And some of our parents were very criticized for it, too.
60 posted on 03/19/2004 9:36:36 AM PST by Desdemona (Music Librarian and provider of cucumber sandwiches, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary. Hats required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson