To: martin_fierro
I'm guessing the judge was looking for an excuse to kick this case. I know of no rules against a lunchtime beer though obviously juror intoxication would be a basis to appeal a conviction.
Worse come to worst the judge could simply have recessed the trial for the afternoon and resumed with a fully sober jury the next day. That he didn't makes me wonder what the unsaid part of the story is.
Beyond that I suppose it's lucky the judge didn;t jail the juror for contempt. I suppose a mug shot would then be appropriate.
10 posted on
03/19/2004 3:58:55 AM PST by
tlb
To: tlb
I agree. I think this judge was simply looking for an excuse.
12 posted on
03/19/2004 5:00:29 AM PST by
1rudeboy
To: tlb
I know of no rules against a lunchtime beer though obviously juror intoxication would be a basis to appeal a conviction. I just did federal jury duty, western District, Oklahoma. The info the mailed me before I went specifically said no alcohol. Period.
18 posted on
03/19/2004 7:21:14 AM PST by
kjam22
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson