Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Close to Syria Economic Penalties ('You're either with us, or with the terrorists')
Associated Press | Friday, March 19, 2004 | By KEN GUGGENHEIM

Posted on 03/19/2004 2:29:36 PM PST by JohnHuang2

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush is expected to order tough economic sanctions against Syria, which the administration says has aggravated tensions in the Middle East by supporting militant groups.

The penalties, which could be announced next week, will go beyond the minimum requirements of a bill targeting Syria that was approved by Congress last year, according to congressional sources.

That would mark a reversal for an administration that initially opposed the legislation. The administration agreed to support the bill only after it was revised to give the president the power to waive all penalties.

Bush signed the Syria Accountability Act in December, one month after Congress overwhelmingly approved it. It bars U.S. exports to Syria of dual-use items that could have military applications. It also requires Bush to choose at least two of six possible economic or diplomatic sanctions.

Congressional sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, said they have been told the administration plans to choose three sanctions. One would bar Syrian planes from flying over or landing in the United States. Another would prohibit new investments by U.S. oil companies in Syria. It was not clear whether other U.S. business operations in Syria would also be prohibited. Bilateral trade with Syria is about $300 million a year.

One source said the third penalty would be a ban on U.S. exports to Syria, other than food and medicine.

Syria's ambassador, Imad Moustapha, said this week that his government has not been informed of sanctions and refuses to discuss the matter with U.S. officials. He said the bill will hurt U.S. efforts to improve its image in Arab nations. Moustapha also said that intelligence sharing has declined since Congress approved the sanctions because U.S. officials are now reluctant to deal with Syria.

Syria provided the United States with intelligence on al-Qaida after the Sept. 1, 2001, attacks. Though some U.S. officials have played down the importance of that, the cooperation probably discouraged the administration from imposing sanctions that would have reduced diplomatic contacts.

A co-sponsor of the bill, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., said the administration doesn't want to cut off communications with the government of President Bashar Assad.

``We don't want to back them into a corner where there is no return,'' said Ros-Lehtinen, chairwoman of the International Relations Middle East subcommittee. She said there is still hope that Assad will ``read the writing on the wall and do the right thing and truly cooperate.''

The bill's author, Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., said, ``Economic sanctions are actually the tougher sanctions.'' If that's what the administration has chosen, he said, ``I'm delighted with it.''

``What's most important is that the administration is sending a strong signal to Syria that business as usual is over and I think that's even more important than the sanctions itself,'' Engel said.

Syria has been on the State Department's list of terror-sponsoring nations for its support of groups like Hamas and Hezbollah that attack Israel. U.S. officials have also said that Syria hasn't done enough to prevent anti-American fighters and arms from crossing its border with Iraq. They have also criticized its domination of Lebanon, where it has based thousands of soldiers.

Despite its criticism of Syria, the administration initially saw the bill as a restraint on its diplomatic options. Even after the waivers were included, Bush demonstrated his lack of enthusiasm by signing the bill without any fanfare.

The likelihood of a waiver diminished in recent months as administration officials stepped up criticism of Syria. A waiver could also be politically awkward at a time that Bush is highlighting his efforts against terrorism.

Top administration officials reached a general agreement on the substance of the sanctions this week, but final details have to be completed before Bush signs the order, administration and congressional sources said.

A State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said exemptions would be made to the export restrictions to allow the sale of aircraft spare parts, so Syrian planes are not endangered, and to allow the sale of communications equipment, to help Syrians get access to outside information.

On the Net:

Text of the sanctions bill, H.R. 1828: http://thomas.loc.gov


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: syria
Friday, March 19, 2004

Quote of the Day by Smartass

1 posted on 03/19/2004 2:29:36 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
A very good move by President Bush!
2 posted on 03/19/2004 2:56:22 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
About time!

One more step on the road to Damascus
3 posted on 03/19/2004 3:02:01 PM PST by endowedbycreator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
She said there is still hope that Assad will ``read the writing on the wall and do the right thing and truly cooperate.''


I'll have whatever she's drinking, john.
4 posted on 03/19/2004 3:39:42 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I think your crater image is more appropriate than sanctions.
5 posted on 03/20/2004 7:40:49 AM PST by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Seems like we are still pussy footing around if you ask me.
6 posted on 03/20/2004 9:20:22 AM PST by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scannell
Got to get UN approval...says Kerry!
7 posted on 03/20/2004 9:30:40 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
We are going to have to get very serious about terrorism.
We have just been playing with the terrorists and potential terrorists. Are we going to over look the fact that Islam is just as political as Communistm?
8 posted on 03/20/2004 9:48:19 AM PST by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
answer to your question: I don't know.
nobody wants to say what you said in this administration.

we seem to fear admitting or telling the truth about there being 1.2 billion potential belt bombers out there, itching to bring about the mahdi's return and to kill all us infidels, jews, christians, atheists, buddhists, hindus and such.

islam.... is a death and murdering cult.
It is WORSE than communism.
we ought to know this by now.
9 posted on 03/20/2004 12:16:51 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson