Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T
Albright was concerned about the reaction of world opinion to a retaliation against Muslims, and the impact it would have in the final days of the Clinton Middle East peace process.

The “Peace Talks” were little more than a photo-opt for Bill Clinton as he held priminister Barak and Arafat at Camp David hostage. The sham didn’t work – all smoke and mirrors for more US $$s – Clinton the peace maker – NOT!

Does anyone recall what this actually cost the United States in tax dollars for Arafat-the-terrorist?

16 posted on 03/23/2004 7:03:26 AM PST by yoe (The worse it is – the better it is!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yoe
Photo-op was a side benefit, in my view. The talks were serious business for clinton. One doesn't have to look too closely at the photos to see his arm-twisting of the principals.

Clinton viewed a sham Mideast peace accord as his ticket to the Nobel Peace Prize. Madeleine Albright said as much at the cabinet meeting to determine the disposition of the USS Cole bombing, a clear act of war.

Albright offered the Nobel as the primary reason for not responding militarily. (Clarke was the only one at the meeting in favor of retaliation.)
18 posted on 03/23/2004 7:30:58 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson