Skip to comments.
Withholding Identity From a Law Officer: Your Right or Not?
Associated Press ^
| March 23, 2004
| Gina Holland
Posted on 03/23/2004 6:10:30 AM PST by wallcrawlr
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 501-515 next last
To: cinFLA
To: RightofRight
I always thought it was the law, that you need to carry identification with youIn Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, yes; in the United States of America, no.
To: Cap'n Crunch
123
posted on
03/23/2004 8:06:39 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
To: Cap'n Crunch
18 years14+ before I left.
May God be with you.
124
posted on
03/23/2004 8:07:16 AM PST
by
A2J
(Oh, I wish I was in Dixie...)
To: eno_
There are corrupt cops, I agree. Some get caught, some don't. There is also corruption in every occupation on earth. (I know your not surprised)
But I believe, like I said in my last post, that we will all pay for what we have done when we stand before God.
To: connectthedots
Unless the cop had probable cause to believe the guy had committed a felony, Why a felony? He could have arrested the guy for a misdemeanor as well.
126
posted on
03/23/2004 8:09:42 AM PST
by
A2J
(Oh, I wish I was in Dixie...)
To: A2J
And you also. My wife and I just bought an established business, (pizza lol) now hopefully I'll be able to buy 4 years military and retire in 4 years, 5 months and 7 days. God willing.
To: cinFLA
Yeah. Better to let the drinking a$$hole to continue driving down the road whacking his daughter. Ahhh... "a report" of someone striking a female passenger. Forst there was a witeness, then the witness could not be found. No 911 tape. No name. No address. No phone call. No verification.
A cop made up that "report" and lied to a court. Or they were so very unlucky to have the magic disappearing witness call that "report" in on a completely untracable phone in the most important case ever for that PD. How terribly unlucky.
128
posted on
03/23/2004 8:12:15 AM PST
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: Cap'n Crunch
Banks now ask for people's thumb prints and they comply.Banks, to my knowledge, are privately-owned businesses. They should be allowed to ask for any type of security-related identification as they see fit.
If you don't like it, carry it.
It's when the government starts to act like a privately-owned business that bothers me.
129
posted on
03/23/2004 8:12:41 AM PST
by
A2J
(Oh, I wish I was in Dixie...)
To: Sweet Land
The deputy did not need to know the guy's name to determine whether the fight had occurred, as the alleged victim was right there. Huh?
130
posted on
03/23/2004 8:15:25 AM PST
by
cinFLA
To: Cap'n Crunch
And some of the people here fell for it, hook, line and sinker and "arrested me" (by labeling me a fascist Nazi) just like the cop in this story.All harmless fun and games, because we are not sworn officers with a badge and gun.
131
posted on
03/23/2004 8:15:37 AM PST
by
TankerKC
(Clogged Arteries and Still Smilin'!)
To: eno_
Seems like you are not adverse to making things up!
132
posted on
03/23/2004 8:16:44 AM PST
by
cinFLA
To: Cap'n Crunch
Theres some more but I'm too embarrassed to write it.Maybe you have an objective chief, but from my experience, it sounds like you're a "chief's pet."
How often do you wash his unit?
133
posted on
03/23/2004 8:17:41 AM PST
by
A2J
(Oh, I wish I was in Dixie...)
To: A2J
Yeah, banks are privately owned, but they 'got you,' know what I mean? You kinda need them in this country.
And I think the government does act like a privately owned business, with unjust taxes, compulsory education, mandatory insurance, etc.
But that's another thread.
To: cinFLA
The deputy did not need to know the guy's name to determine whether the fight had occurred, as the alleged victim was right there. Huh?
Just what I said. What's puzzling to you?
To: A2J
I just give him free pizza. He's got two captains that wash his car.
To: Sweet Land
"At the heart of the case is an intersection of the Fourth Amendment, which protects people from unreasonable searches, and the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent." How about the First? Shouldn't freedom of speech include the right to keep one's mouth closed?
137
posted on
03/23/2004 8:22:21 AM PST
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: cinFLA
The magic disappearing witness is part of the public record in this case. What am I "making up?"
138
posted on
03/23/2004 8:22:30 AM PST
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: Sweet Land
All the more reason to get his identity.
139
posted on
03/23/2004 8:22:31 AM PST
by
cinFLA
To: TankerKC
Amen.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 501-515 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson