Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU aiding criminals
Bradenton Herald ^ | 03/23/04

Posted on 03/23/2004 8:23:07 AM PST by nypokerface

In October 1997, Jeffrey Curley, a 10-year-old Cambridge, Mass., boy, was playing outside his home when he was lured into a car by Charles Jaynes and Salvatore Sicari.

The two men, seeking a child to rape, attacked Jeffrey, who fought back. Then they choked him to death with a gasoline-soaked rag, molested his dead body in Jayne's apartment in Manchester, N.H., stuffed the body into a cement-filled Rubbermaid container and threw the poor child's remains, like a sack of garbage, into the Great Works River in Maine.

During their trials, at which the men were convicted of murder and sentenced to life without parole, it was revealed that Jaynes and Sicari were members of the abominable North American Man-Boy Love Association. This repugnant group advocates and even instructs its members on the sexual rape of little boys by grown men.

It was also revealed during the trials that Jaynes was a timid pedophile for years, until he joined NAMBLA in 1996, according to his own diary. Then he became emboldened by the idea that there were others who shared his twisted, sick obsession. He fueled his perversion through the group's Web site and e-mails filled with horrid, pornographic images of children. He read with great interest the NAMBLA publication entitled "The Rape and Escape Manual."

Jaynes and others of his notorious ilk take pleasure in inflicting sexual atrocities on the smallest, weakest members of society - our children. In our area, we have seen the horror inflicted on families by the abduction and murder of a child, most recently the Carlie Brucia case. Civilized society itself is ripped apart and wounded by these shocking acts against the defenseless. Obviously, those who commit such crimes should be put away, with no chance to ever walk among us again. But what of groups who aid and abet such heinous criminal acts?

According to the American Civil Liberties Union, NAMBLA is simply exercising its freedom of speech in publishing this bizarre, outlandish material. In fact, the ACLU is defending NAMBLA against a $200 million lawsuit filed by the parents of Jeffrey Curley.

How does the ACLU explain this action?

Here's how:

"The lawsuit involved here, were it to succeed, would strike at the heart of freedom of speech. The case is based on a shocking murder. But the lawsuit says the crime is the responsibility not of those who committed the murder, but of someone who posted vile material on the Internet. The principle is as simple as it is central to true freedom of speech: those who do wrong are responsible for what they do; those who speak about it are not."

Thus, the ACLU rationalizes protecting and providing legal representation to a group that openly preaches pedophilia and arguably encouraged kidnapping, rape and murder.

The evil men behind NAMBLA don't even have to appear in court - the ACLU sends its representatives to handle the matter.

Using the argument that everyone deserves legal representation, the ACLU has decided to save NAMBLA hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees so the group can continue to produce their Web site, pamphlets, guides and other noxious, criminal materials.

How many more children will be butchered before the ACLU wakes up and realizes they have taken an extremely wrong-headed stance on this issue? Little Jeffrey Curley is screaming from his grave: "Don't help the men who did this to me."

If you'd like to let the ACLU know you disagree with their stance on this issue, contact the organization through their national Web site, www.aclu.com. Only by voicing your disgust, and cutting off donations to fund this type of misplaced First Amendment defense, will you be able to make a difference.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: aclu; childkiller; homosexualagenda; jeffreycurley; nambla; pedophiles

1 posted on 03/23/2004 8:23:08 AM PST by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
What was the ACLU's position on the anti-abortion website that was sued for promoting violence against abortionists?
2 posted on 03/23/2004 8:27:26 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Bastards. The ACLU and these people they represent. Bastards.
3 posted on 03/23/2004 8:28:58 AM PST by TheBigB (Allah can kiss my @ss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
Your rhetorical question skewers their position and illustrates the slimy depth of their hypocrisy.

Well done!
4 posted on 03/23/2004 8:29:08 AM PST by IGOTMINE (We are being incrementally criminalized by a government that does not trust us with firearms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
But the lawsuit says the crime is the responsibility not of those who committed the murder, but of someone who posted vile material on the Internet.

It's Gore's fault for inventing the internet. Ugh, are we at all surprised the ACLU would do this? Evil walks amoung us and his name is ACLU.

5 posted on 03/23/2004 8:30:22 AM PST by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
The ACLU is a member in good standing of the New Butt Order (NBO) and one of Satan's most prized agents here in earth.
6 posted on 03/23/2004 8:35:34 AM PST by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
(anti)American Criminal Lovers Union

(anti)American Communists Lawyers Union

and any other despicable name you can think of.

7 posted on 03/23/2004 8:45:52 AM PST by Johnny Gage (How can someone "draw a blank?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
One only has to look at the ALCU to realize that the term "criminal lawyer" is redundant.
8 posted on 03/23/2004 8:57:41 AM PST by scooter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
What was the ACLU's position on the anti-abortion website that was sued for promoting violence against abortionists?

The ACLU is AWOL on authentic issues of free speech.

9 posted on 03/23/2004 9:03:04 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (JF'nK = major waste of oxygen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
I wonder if the child's daddy owned a gun..and why he didn't use it.
10 posted on 03/23/2004 9:04:10 AM PST by JamesA ( The more you try to change my convictions the more resolved I am to keep them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
How many more children will be butchered before the ACLU wakes up

They will never wake up. They can never wake up. These people have no concept of God. Thus only what can happen to themselves is relevant to their views of what should and should not be. They are in no danger from murderous pedophiles as they have passed the relevant age. Potential danger to their children is not germane because their children are not themselves.It is possible, however, that these people could at some point in their lives decide to experience the gratification of pedophilia. Thus pedophiles must be protected.

That mindset informs their promotion of abortion, also. Abortion is convenient for people who have no reason not to engage in any particular form of behavior and ACLU members are in no danger of being aborted.

Opposition to the death penalty comes from the same place. An ACLU type just might decide to commit a heinous murder some day and he certainly does not want to have to face a death penalty.

If there is no God there is no Future, no absolute anything. Thus immediate gratification is the only goal of life. Fending off threats to immediate gratification is an ongoing necessity.

11 posted on 03/23/2004 9:21:08 AM PST by arthurus (fighting them OVER THERE is better than fighting them OVER HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
How many more children will be butchered before the ACLU wakes up

They will never wake up. They can never wake up. These people have no concept of God. Thus only what can happen to themselves is relevant to their views of what should and should not be. They are in no danger from murderous pedophiles as they have passed the relevant age. Potential danger to their children is not germane because their children are not themselves.It is possible, however, that these people could at some point in their lives decide to experience the gratification of pedophilia. Thus pedophiles must be protected.

That mindset informs their promotion of abortion, also. Abortion is convenient for people who have no reason not to engage in any particular form of behavior and ACLU members are in no danger of being aborted.

Opposition to the death penalty comes from the same place. An ACLU type just might decide to commit a heinous murder some day and he certainly does not want to have to face a death penalty.

If there is no God there is no Future, no absolute anything. Thus immediate gratification is the only goal of life. Fending off threats to immediate gratification is an ongoing necessity.

12 posted on 03/23/2004 9:21:27 AM PST by arthurus (fighting them OVER THERE is better than fighting them OVER HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
How many more children will be butchered before the ACLU wakes up

They will never wake up. They can never wake up. These people have no concept of God. Thus only what can happen to themselves is relevant to their views of what should and should not be. They are in no danger from murderous pedophiles as they have passed the relevant age. Potential danger to their children is not germane because their children are not themselves.It is possible, however, that these people could at some point in their lives decide to experience the gratification of pedophilia. Thus pedophiles must be protected.

That mindset informs their promotion of abortion, also. Abortion is convenient for people who have no reason not to engage in any particular form of behavior and ACLU members are in no danger of being aborted.

Opposition to the death penalty comes from the same place. An ACLU type just might decide to commit a heinous murder some day and he certainly does not want to have to face a death penalty.

If there is no God there is no Future, no absolute anything. Thus immediate gratification is the only goal of life. Fending off threats to immediate gratification is an ongoing necessity.

13 posted on 03/23/2004 9:21:30 AM PST by arthurus (fighting them OVER THERE is better than fighting them OVER HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
My tagline is a bumper sticker on our SUV. Mostly we get thumbs up from folks who read it. Once in awhile, we receive the single finger salute, but for the most part people know the ACLU is all scum.
14 posted on 03/23/2004 9:39:54 AM PST by ozaukeemom (Nuke the ACLU and their snivel rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Bill O'Reilly has attcked the ACLU several times because of their demented support of child molesters. ACLU is truly repulsive and evil.
15 posted on 03/23/2004 9:42:34 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Just boggles the mind - how do these people sleep at night?
16 posted on 03/23/2004 9:46:55 AM PST by Core_Conservative ("right now western Europe is looking like a dead horse." Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Who funds these people? Does anyone know their contributors? I thought they received some govt. money. If so, time to defund.

TC

17 posted on 03/23/2004 11:35:37 AM PST by I_be_tc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson