Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lack of Good Intelligence Information Hindered Efforts to Get Bin Laden, Commission Reports
Associated Press ^ | Mar 23, 2004 | Hope Yen

Posted on 03/23/2004 12:48:02 PM PST by BenLurkin

WASHINGTON (AP) - Lacking the detailed intelligence needed to strike directly at Osama bin Laden, Clinton and Bush administration officials fruitlessly sought a diplomatic solution to get the al-Qaida leader out of Afghanistan, a federal panel reported Tuesday. Not until the day before the attacks did U.S. officials settle on a strategy to overthrow the Taliban Afghan government in case a final diplomatic push failed. That strategy was expected to take three years, the independent commission investigating the attacks said in one of two preliminary reports.

Separately, President Bush said he would have acted more quickly "had my administration had any information that terrorists were going to attack New York City on Sept. 11."

Responding to criticism in a new book by his former counterterrorism adviser, Bush denied that he had ignored bin Laden and the threat of the al-Qaida terror network while focusing on Iraq's Saddam Hussein.

The commission report said that U.S. officials feared a failed attempt on bin Laden could kill innocents and would only boost bin Laden's prestige. And the American public and Congress would have opposed any large-scale military operations before the September 2001 attacks, the report said.

In the end, it said, pursuing diplomacy over military action allowed bin Laden and other al-Qaida leaders to elude capture.

The panel, formally the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, presented its findings as it began hearings with top-level Bush and Clinton administration officials. The aim was to question officials on their efforts to stop bin Laden in the years leading up to Sept. 11.

Former Defense Secretary William Cohen said the Clinton administration recognized the dangers posed by al-Qaida and considered the United States to be "at war" against the terrorist organization. Three times after August 1998 U.S. officials considered using missile strikes to kill bin Laden, but each time it was decided the intelligence wasn't good enough to ensure success, he said.

Earlier, Secretary of State Colin Powell stressed administration efforts to fight terrorism, an implicit rebuttal to criticism in a new book by Bush's former counterterrorism coordinator, Richard Clarke, who is expected to testify Wednesday.

"President Bush and his entire national security team understood that terrorism had to be among our highest priorities and it was," Powell said.

Likewise, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright told the commission that President Clinton and his team "did everything we could, everything we could think of, based on the knowledge we had, to protect our people and disrupt and defeat al-Qaida."

The commission's staff has spent months interviewing Clinton and Bush administration officials and poring over documents. Its preliminary findings will be considered by the 10-member panel, which plans to issue a final report this summer.

Among the staff findings:

- U.S. officials were concerned that Taliban supporters in Pakistan's military would warn bin Laden of pending operations. The U.S. government had information that the former head of Pakistani intelligence, Hamid Gul, as a private citizen, had contacted Taliban leaders in July 1999 and assured them that he would provide three or four hours of warning before any U.S. missile launch as he had the "last time'" - an apparent reference to a failed 1998 cruise missile attack on bin Laden.

- Pentagon counterterrorism officials prepared a strategy urging the Defense Department in September 1998 "to take up the gauntlet that international terrorists have thrown at our feet." But the paper was rejected by a deputy undersecretary as "too aggressive."

- Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld told the commission that "he did not recall any particular counterterrorism issue that engaged his attention before" the Sept. 11 attacks, other than using unmanned aircraft against bin Laden.

- In a secret diplomatic mission, Saudi Arabia won a commitment from the Taliban to expel bin Laden, but Taliban leaders later reneged.

"From the spring of 1997 to September 2001, the U.S. government tried to persuade the Taliban to expel bin Laden to a country where he could face justice," the report said. "The efforts employed inducements, warnings and sanctions. All these efforts failed."

Shortly before the attacks, the Bush administration was debating how to force bin Laden out. At a Sept. 10, 2001, meeting of second-tier Cabinet officials, officials settled on a three-phase strategy. The first step called for dispatching an envoy to talk to the Taliban. If this failed, diplomatic pressure would be applied and covert funding and support for anti-Taliban fighters would be increased.

If both failed, "the deputies agreed that the United States would seek to overthrow the Taliban regime through more direct action," the report said. Deputy national security adviser Stephen Hadley said the strategy had a three-year timeframe.

The report described Saudi Arabia as "a problematic ally in combating Islamic extremism," citing lax oversight of charitable donations that may have funded terrorists.

The Clinton administration had early indications of terrorist links to bin Laden and future Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as early as 1995, but let years pass as it pursued criminal indictments and diplomatic solutions to subduing them abroad, the commission's report said.

Clarke, who was Bush's counterterrorism coordinator and a holdover from the Clinton administration, said in a book out this week that he warned Bush officials in a January 2001 memo about a growing al-Qaida threat after an attack on the USS Cole in Yemen but was put off by National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice. Rice "gave me the impression she had never heard the term" al-Qaida, Clarke wro


TOPICS: War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; 911commission; clintondidit; clintonlegacy; commission; intelligence

1 posted on 03/23/2004 12:48:03 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Okay clas, who gutted the U.S. intelligence services? Was it:

A) George W. Bush

B) John AShcroft

D) Donald Rumsfeld

D) Slick Willy Clinton
2 posted on 03/23/2004 12:51:08 PM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Bad intelligence, eh?? Remember the Levin amendment (can't do business with people who may be bad) and gutting the funding of intelligence agencies?? Dems are responsble for those blunders. If the mainstream media gave the Dems a tenth of the scrutiny they give Repubs, the Dems wouldn't get 25% of the vote.
3 posted on 03/23/2004 12:52:37 PM PST by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Itsn't it interesting how the Bush Admin argument that they used the "intelligence information they were provided" to understand that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. The RATs all say that's a LIE - that BUSH KNEW. BUT NOW!!! When all Clinton's men are saying they acted or didn't act based on the "intelligence informaiton they were provided".... we are all supposed to say... "Ohhhhhhh.... THAT'S what happened... ok, no problem. BUSH'S FAULT! Pleeeeeeeeze.
4 posted on 03/23/2004 1:01:10 PM PST by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I now this is probably a minor point, but I wish to clarify the use of the phrase "Intelligence Information."

First, they are mutually exclusive, though interdependent."

Second, "information" is the data collected from the various source: humans, sensors, satellites, radio intercept, etc.

Third, "intelligence" is what is gleaned from the "information" after analysis.

Therefore, the sequence is

"Intelligence information" is misleading and incorrect.

Thanks for indulging my sensibilities

5 posted on 03/23/2004 1:02:26 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson