[backtothestreets]

No, we do not need a Constitutional Amendment defining marriage.

We need strong conservative leadership to reverse the socialist practices of government that awards entitlements and benefits based on marital status.

If these stipends for marriage stop, the same sex marriage issue will stop too.

Do not listen to Constitutional liberals, fiscal liberals, political liberals, or social liberals that say they are trying to protect marriage. They are trying to protect socialism.

True conservatives would choose to abandon the socialist policies that gave this issue legs.

[GovernmentShrinker]

Exactly. And government should get 100% OUT of the marriage business. No free person needs a license from the government to set up a household.

[woodyinscc]

True conservatives would choose to abandon the socialist policies that gave this issue legs.

Do not kid yourself, the gays and liberals do not want same sex marriage for economic benefit. They want moral equality and nothing less. The economic benefits are a smokescreen, and they drew you in, just like the lawyers want to draw the Judges in. The attack on our system is relentless, and because of the apathy of most voters, a Constitutional Amendment is the only alternative.