Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There Be Dragons: New Deep-Sea Predator Species Discovered
Scienec Daily ^ | 3-24-2004 | HBOI

Posted on 03/24/2004 3:36:36 PM PST by blam

Source: Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution
Date: 2004-03-24

There Be Dragons: New Deep-sea Predator Species Discovered

FT. PIERCE, Fla. -- Dr. Tracey Sutton, a fish ecologist at the HARBOR BRANCH Oceanographic Institution in Ft. Pierce, Fla., has discovered a new species in a bizarre and elusive family of deep-sea predatory fish known collectively as dragonfish. The find, reported in the current issue of the journal Copeia, is the first new dragonfish species discovered in more than a decade.

The first specimen of the new species, dubbed Eustomias jimcraddocki, was large, compared to the average pencil-sized dragonfish at about six inches long and roughly the size of a hot dog. Sutton named it after Jim Craddock, a legend in the deep-sea fish biology field.

Sutton discovered the fish during an expedition to Bear Seamount, off New England, that was sponsored by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Office of Ocean Exploration. Now the head of HARBOR BRANCH's Fish and Plankton Ecology Department, he was at the time a Postdoctoral Scholar at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts.

"The fact that we are still finding new species in one of the best-studied oceanic regions in the world tells us there is still a lot more out there to be known," says Sutton, who is also a leader in the ambitious international effort to identify all ocean animal and plant species known as the Census of Marine Life.

Sutton plucked the new dragonfish from a net being used to sample the study area's marine life. While identifying the catch on board, he realized that the specimen represented a new species. Later he traveled to the Smithsonian Institution and Harvard to do some fish sleuthing. In museum collections at those institutions, he found 13 additional specimens collected in the Atlantic over the past 30 years that had previously been either unidentified or misidentified. This work verified that the new species was in fact unique.

Dragonfish are so rare that scientists have often been forced to study and describe new species based on a single specimen. "I really wanted more than just one fish," says Sutton, "so I was relieved to find more."

As with all dragonfish, which live at depths ranging from about 600 to 3,000 feet, the new species has menacing teeth, and a mouth that can jut out to engulf prey as wide as it is. They also have small organs along their bellies that produce light, or bioluminescence, and that may serve as camouflage to make the fish blend in with faint sunlight from above, thus appearing invisible to potential predators below.

The distinguishing feature of dragonfishes is a long thin protrusion known as a barbel anchored at the fish's chin that trails below its body. The barbels look like tree branches, and each species has a unique barbel pattern. At the end of the barbel is a bioluminescent organ the animals use like a fishing lure to attract prey, mainly lanternfish. If the barbels served only this function, scientists would expect all dragonfishes to have similar barbels. However, because the protrusions are so varied, some theorize the fish may also use them to identify other members of their own species for reproduction.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This story has been adapted from a news release issued by Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deepsea; discovered; dragons; environment; new; oceans; predator; species
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2004 3:36:37 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
This monster is 6" long.....
2 posted on 03/24/2004 3:41:54 PM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Click lower right to enlarge. Nightmarish.


3 posted on 03/24/2004 3:43:14 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I wondered where my last girlfriend got off to.......
4 posted on 03/24/2004 3:49:35 PM PST by glasseye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I kept a dragonfish in one of my aquariums for several years. They are the UGLIEST things you've ever seen.
5 posted on 03/24/2004 3:50:01 PM PST by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
That's just plain ugly. I wonder who wears the bag to make new Dragon Fish.
6 posted on 03/24/2004 3:50:03 PM PST by TASMANIANRED
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeaDragon
YIKES! See post # 3. YIKES!
7 posted on 03/24/2004 3:51:01 PM PST by Argh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Click the 'BUMP' Graphic to Access ALL FR Bump Lists

8 posted on 03/24/2004 3:52:38 PM PST by Fiddlstix (This Space Available for Rent or Lease by the Day, Week, or Month. Reasonable Rates. Inquire within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Can You Post It Bigger?
9 posted on 03/24/2004 3:53:59 PM PST by cmsgop (For Gosh Sake MCI, NO MORE JAMES TAYLOR !!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Scary fish.
10 posted on 03/24/2004 3:57:00 PM PST by Argh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Looks yummy!
11 posted on 03/24/2004 3:57:28 PM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Is that supposed to scare me? LOL
12 posted on 03/24/2004 4:00:11 PM PST by fish hawk (I have two arms: Colt and Smith and Wesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Dragonfish are so rare that scientists have often been forced to study and describe new species based on a single specimen."

UMMMM....ok. How come PETA and all the envirofreaks aren't out protesting the killing of a rare fish species?
13 posted on 03/24/2004 4:02:44 PM PST by Chewbacca (I think I will stay single. Getting married is just so 'gay'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop

(Sorry, I just posted it as I found it. This one should fit on everybody's screen.)

14 posted on 03/24/2004 4:04:07 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Here's a few shots of the freshwater variety - they make cool pets:


15 posted on 03/24/2004 4:04:36 PM PST by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chewbacca
"Jim Craddock, a legend in the deep-sea fish biology field"

There's an epitaph I'd be proud to have!
16 posted on 03/24/2004 4:06:19 PM PST by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam
Not good on my conversions, but is 142 mm close to 6 inches? seems rather small!
Eustomias jimcraddocki Sutton & Hartel, a new species of deep-sea dragonfish from the Western North Atlantic. The holotype (shown here), a 142 mm male, was taken at 800 m depth off Georges Bank, July 2002. The fish is named in honor of Dr. James Craddock of W.H.O.I. in recognition of his many contributions to our knowledge of deep-sea fishes. » More about Sutton's research
17 posted on 03/24/2004 4:08:43 PM PST by AgThorn (Go go Bush!! But don't turn your back on America with "immigrant amnesty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop
Besides . . . I imagine that was the last thing many a shrimp ever saw in their poor widdle lives and I wanted to get the sense of that horror. ;-)
18 posted on 03/24/2004 4:09:40 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002
The freshwater variety don't have those teeth, then? They look docile enough, not like their deep sea cousins!
19 posted on 03/24/2004 4:12:40 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop
I wanted to get . . .

I wanted EVERYONE to get . . .

20 posted on 03/24/2004 4:14:03 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson