Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
But Clarke’s biggest fudge is obvious. He worked in the Clinton White House for eight years, closely monitoring each attack made on U.S. interests by Osama bin Laden. He was also privy to intelligence connecting Saddam Hussein to al Qaeda, long before 9/11. President Bush’s question about a connection between the two was logical, and based on prior intelligence Clarke would have reviewed.
Clarke’s convenient blindness to these facts is clear evidence of his political motivations. The television networks’ blindness to Clarke’s purposeful memory loss is nothing more than classic media bias.


Truly frightening, but oh so frighteningly true...
5 posted on 03/24/2004 9:46:38 PM PST by KangarooJacqui (The Internet - it's a jungle out there... *brushes vines away from screen*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KangarooJacqui; kattracks
The television networks’ blindness to Clarke’s purposeful memory loss is nothing more than classic media bias.

The Clarke affair is much worse than "classic" media bias.

This is an all-out, very undemocratic assault on the Bush Administration.

9 posted on 03/24/2004 10:04:31 PM PST by Spotsy (Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson