Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair, Gaddafi Pledge to Fight Al Qaeda
Yahooo via Reuters ^ | 3/25/04

Posted on 03/25/2004 10:55:21 AM PST by areafiftyone

TRIPOLI (Reuters) - Britain's Tony Blair (news - web sites) sealed Libya's return to the international fold on Thursday with an historic handshake for Muammar Gaddafi (news - web sites) and an agreement to fight al Qaeda together.

After more than an hour of talks, the prime minister said Libya's rejection of banned weapons and rapprochement with the West could act as a template for other Arab nations to turn their back on Islamic extremism.

"We are showing by our engagement with Libya today that it is possible for countries in the Arab world to work with the United States and the UK to defeat the common enemy of extremist fanatical terrorism driven by al Qaeda," he told reporters.

"It is a very, very important signal for the whole of the Arab world."

On the first visit to Libya by a British leader since 1943, Blair was whisked to a ceremonial tent outside Tripoli to meet the Libyan leader, once condemned by former U.S. President Ronald Reagan (news - web sites) as the "mad dog of the Middle East."

There, the pair symbolically shook hands for the cameras before vowing to work together to oppose militant Islamism.

"You are looking good, you are still young," Gaddafi told Blair, 50, speaking in English.

Blair said Gaddafi recognized "a common cause with us in the fight against al Qaeda, extremism and terrorism, which threatens not just the western world but the Arab world also."

The UK leader pledged not to forget the pain caused by the 1988 Lockerbie bombing (news - web sites) which killed 270 people but said Libya should be welcomed back into the international fold.

"In reaching out the hand of partnership today, we do not forget the past," he said. "But we do try in the light of the genuine changes happening to move beyond it."

BUSINESS DIVIDEND

Gains to British business from the diplomatic thaw were notched up even before Blair arrived. Oil giant Royal Dutch/Shell won a $200 million gas exploration deal with Libya.

Blair also announced that defense contractor BAE Systems would also clinch a major Libyan deal shortly and that a trade mission would visit Tripoli in April.

But experts said the major spoils may go to the United States. "Gaddafi knows the only game in town is Washington, so there will be a big slice of Libyan oil for the Americans," said Fred Halliday of the London School of Economics.

The leaders of Spain and Italy have also met Gaddafi in recent months, and earlier this week Assistant Secretary of State William Burns became the highest-level U.S. official to go to Libya in more than 30 years.

Tripoli announced in December it would abandon efforts to acquire chemical, biological and nuclear weapons in a bid to further mend ties with the West after agreeing to pay damages for the Lockerbie bombing.

London played the leading role in persuading it to renounce banned weapons. "It is remarkable progress, given where we have been," said Blair, who is the first British leader to visit Libya since Winston Churchill.

 

He said Gaddafi had convinced him that steps he had taken were "irrevocable."

Foreign Minister Mohamed Abderrhmane Chalgam said Libya, like the West, opposed Osama bin Laden (news - web sites)'s al Qaeda network.

"They are a real obstacle against our progress, against our security...against any change in our region," he told reporters.

Britain's opposition Conservatives said the visit was "highly questionable," coming a day after Blair attended a memorial service for this month's Madrid rail bombing victims -- Europe's biggest terror attack since Lockerbie. But many relatives of the Lockerbie victims say they support the diplomatic milestone.

(Additional reporting by Lamine Ghanmi).


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: allies; alqaeda; gaddafi; libya; tonyblair; tripolivisit; willingcoalition

1 posted on 03/25/2004 10:55:21 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Intel said that Saddam had WMD stockpiles and that Qaddafi had a long ways to go to develop WMDs. Both reports were wrong. But because of the Iraq War, we don't have to worry about either any more in that department.

Liberals are the only people I know who demand that you must have known beforehand how something would turn out, or else it's a failure even if it succeeds - as they simultaneously demand that we do more of a liberal agenda that has been proven time and time again to be an abject failure.

2 posted on 03/25/2004 10:58:25 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson