Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MNLDS
I believe she means that if we were facing a tangible threat, NO American president would knowingly compromise the defense of our nation despite angering other countries.
18 posted on 03/26/2004 9:21:49 PM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: DLfromthedesert
The problem with your understanding is that "facing a tangible threat" means something entirely different to a kerry, a clinton, or a carter than it would mean to a rational human being.

I honestly believe that half the democrats in congress would hand over the keys to anyone who had a good presentation and promised to raise the minimum wage while increasing taxes on the over $100K "rich" folks.

35 posted on 03/26/2004 9:46:16 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: DLfromthedesert
"...NO American president would knowingly compromise the defense of our nation despite angering other countries."

Are you willing to bet all our lives on that? I would refer you to the Klintoons relationship with China and the transfer of technology to them. And the Leftist Kerry has tried repeatedly to geld our military/weapons.

77 posted on 03/27/2004 6:04:46 AM PST by Thom Pain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson