Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeAtlanta
I agree. Kerry is the biggest hypocrite on the face of the earth, and I cringe everytime I hear him talk about his empathy for the "working people". He can't even squeeze in a day's work at the Senate.

I'll be sending this to all on my email list.
4 posted on 03/27/2004 10:51:47 AM PST by LisaMalia (In Memory of Sgt. James W. Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LisaMalia
Actually Ted Kennedy is the biggerst hypocrite on the face of the earth. Kerry however, does come in a close second.
9 posted on 03/27/2004 10:58:10 AM PST by AngieGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LisaMalia
If he were to become president, how many of these many dwellings would the taxpayers have to pay to secure as Kerry's alternate white houses?
77 posted on 03/27/2004 7:15:16 PM PST by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LisaMalia
The next thing to do is to get a lot of people to write to www.snopes.com and ask them if this is an Urban Legend.

All good lefties go to snopes when they get an e-mail. If they don't find it, they assume the story to be false if it hurts their man, and true if it hurts the one they don't like.

91 posted on 03/28/2004 7:39:33 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (never surrender, this is for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LisaMalia
We have to define Kerry in one word, and that
word is MUDSLINGER . . . . Pass it on. No one
likes a MUDSLINGER. Pass it on.
136 posted on 03/29/2004 1:27:38 PM PST by Twinkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LisaMalia; JulieRNR21; Barset; lilylangtree; Brad's Gramma; sciencediet
Thanks for all your input on the Kerry homesteads. Have any of you gotten someone sending it back to you?

BTW, I just got this from my brother-n-law. It is the making of a great educational e-mail. Please copy and send it out, too. Afterward, go to www.snopes.com and ask them if it is an Urban Legend. (evil grin) I love educating those left bias snobs at snopes :-D

------------------------------------

Subject: The Worst President?

The Worst President?

Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war.
They complain about his prosecution of it.
They point out that Iraq didn't attack the U.S. and we shouldn't have went to war with them.

One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.

Most of these claims come from liberals in the Democratic party.

Being an Independent I decided to take a look at history and see if using that criteria who else could be called the "worst" president.

FDR ( a democrat) led us into World War II against Germany, Italy, and Japan. Neither Germany or Italy ever attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year. That's 1 Democratic President, 4 years and 450,000 American lives.

Harry Truman (a democrat) finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year. That's 1 Democratic President, 3 years, and 55,000 American lives.

John F. Kennedy (a democrat) started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.

Lyndon B. Johnson (a democrat) turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.

Finally in the 1970's Richard Nixon (a republican) pulled us out of Vietnam.

That's 2 Democratic Presidents, 1 Republican President, 13 years, and 58,000 American lives.

Bill Clinton went to war in Bosnia WITHOUT UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us.

The Clinton administration was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.

In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured Saddam Hussein, who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We lost about 600 soldiers, an average of 200 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home. That's 1 Republican President, 2 1/2 years, and about 600 American lives.

Then the Democrats complained about how long the war on terror is taking, but... It took less time to take Iraq than it TOOK JANET RENO TO TAKE THE BRANCH DAVIDIAN C0MPOUND! THAT WAS A 51 DAY OPERATION!

We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for LESS TIME THAN IT TOOK HILLARY CLINTON TO LOCATE THE ROSE LAW FIRM RECORDS IN HER OWN OFFICE!

It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took TED KENNEDY TO CALL THE POLICE AND GIVE HIMSELF UP AFTER HE HAD AN ACCIDENT WHILE DRUNK AND SANK HIS OLDSMOBILE IN THE CHAPPAQUIDIK RIVER KILLING THE YOUNG LADY WHO WAS HIS PASSENGER!

And Finally...

IT TOOK LESS TIME FOR THE U.S. MILITARY TO TAKE IRAQ THAN IT DID TO COUNT THE VOTES IN FLORIDA IN 2000!!!!

But for some reason the Democrats didn't complain about how long any of that took! Hmmm.....

** Copy and send this e-mail to everyone in your e-mail book! Try to at least send to 5 others. Let's set the record straight!**

148 posted on 03/30/2004 7:23:25 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (never surrender, this is for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LisaMalia
There is a blog that is well worth the read about the hypocrisy of the AFL-CIO:

"I have a warning for the AFL-CIO and Working America, and any other leftist nimwits - Back off and stop asking Washington for favors. "Nice" politicians are absolutely killing us. Its not enough for politicians to tell you pretty stories of what they *want* for you. No politician is going to tell you they want you to be too expensive to employ, or that your employer is going to priced out of the market and go bankrupt or be forced to move to China, or that the regulation they impose on your employer to improve the quality of your job may have such a high cost of compliance that they are forced to lay you off, but that may be the effect of whatever policy sounds good to you in the voting booth."

http://www.livejournal.com/users/rachelmills/30954.html
159 posted on 04/02/2004 8:01:49 AM PST by LP1971
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson