Clarke deserves chutzpah award for al-Qaida claims

The Union Leader. ^ | March 28, 2004 | Charles Krauthammer

[Admin Moderator]

Krauthammer is syndicated by the Washington Post. Please excerpt next time. Thanks.

[easonc52]

In this light, he did owe everyone an apology because HE COULD HAVE MADE A DIFFERENCE AND HE CHOSE NOT TO

In relistening to Clarke in the 9/11 commission, I noticed he said more than once, that Iraq was always known to be harboring terrorists, and also Iran, and Syria.

It seems the dems would have a problem with that sort of testimony, as they mostly project that it was a bad idea to go to Iraq, and that Iraq clearly had nothing to do with 9/11.

My understanding is that the WOT is against even states that harbor terrorists.

For some reason, I keep getting the impression that his main idea was always to cut off the head, so to speak, by pounding the rubble and blowing up tents and jungle gyms. Haven't heard much about any comprehensive plan for going after terrorists wherever they are, as our current administration does and is.

Is also sickening that he got applause several times.

[easonc52]

... and to make my day lighter, after the C-SPAN replay of Clarke in the 9/11 commission, they are playing Senator Frist's entire statements to the Senate.

Frist also brings up an Emai Clarke sent to his supervisor during the time that we're still pulling bodies out of the rubble, and Frist says it was clearly aimed at throughing any blame away from him regarding the terrible 9/11 attack.

Frist has very carefully thought out what he is doing and saying regarding Clarke.

Bravo!!!

I did look for the transcript to share, but haven't found it yet. Sorry.

[Seeing More Clearly Now]

Yes, and eight years of everyone being AWOL were under Clinton, right? Hello?