Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group: Oust gay-wed judges
The Boston Herald ^ | Sunday, March 28, 2004 | Jules Crittenden

Posted on 03/28/2004 6:24:03 AM PST by Radix

An anti-gay-marriage crusader said he expects a legislative bill will be filed this week to remove the four Supreme Judicial Court justices who supported homosexual unions, while pro-gay activists took to the streets to drum up support yesterday.

Brian Camenker of the Article 8 Alliance - a group of several hundred activists named for the Massachusetts Constitution provision that holds ``the people have a right . . . to cause their public officer to return to private life'' - says a legislative recall makes more sense than constitutional amendments that have been tying the State House in knots.

``It's the intended remedy when justices do not properly interpret the law,'' said Camenker. ``We cannot credibly call ourselves a democracy when our most basic laws can be undone by four unelected, appointed officials.''

A sharply divided Legislature will reconvene its Constitutional Convention to try again to address proposed amendments banning gay marriage and instituting civil unions in response to the SJC's November ruling that would allow gay marriage by May 17.

Lawmakers, who continue their Constitutional Convention tomorrow, have given preliminary approval to a proposed constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage and, at the same time, legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Camenker said the amendment proposals have created ``chaos,'' and noted that an up-or-down vote on removing the judges could resolve the issue before May 17, while an amendment would take at least two years. Camenker said he has the quiet backing of several unidentified legislators he expects will come forward this week and file the bill on his behalf. The Legislature would then need to approve the legislation and the governor sign it before the justices could be removed.

Specifically, Article 98 of the Massachusetts Constitution says that judges shall ``hold their offices during good behavior'' but can be removed by the governor with consent of the governor's council ``upon address of both houses of the legislature.''

But supporters of gay marriage - who counter that the four judges acted appropriately in defense of equal rights - said they have found more evidence in mainstream Massachusetts of support for their cause.

Patty Connelly, canvassing in Burlington for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force yesterday, said, ``We had a much larger percentage of people who were willing to sign their names than we thought.''

About 120 canvassers who went door to door in the suburbs and several Boston neighborhoods connected with 819 voters yesterday morning, of whom 416 - 50.7 percent - agreed to sign postcards to be delivered to legislators, the task force said. Another 160 - 19.5 percent - were on the fence, though Connelly said many were open to civil unions and opposed the idea of an anti-marriage amendment. A total of 243 - 29.6 percent - opposed gay marriage entirely, while nine - 1.1 percent - were anti-gay activists.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: civilunion; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; judicialactivism; liberalism; marriage; massachusetts; prisoners; samesexmarriage
Camenker said he has the quiet backing of several unidentified legislators he expects will come forward this week and file the bill on his behalf.

I'll believe that when I see it.

1 posted on 03/28/2004 6:24:03 AM PST by Radix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Radix
Massachusetts will be the only state where gays insist that the "Rule of Law" be followed.
2 posted on 03/28/2004 6:50:26 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix
I'm not sure if removing the judges would negate their ruling. I think what will happen, just before May 17th, is that the Governor will not allow anyone to issue a marriage license in the state. I believe he is trying to get the authority to do that.

I do support removing the judges though. If I lived in Massachusetts I would go to the judges' homes and picket, shouting: "Death to judicial activism, NOW!!" and "Who do you judges think you are...GODS!?!" Anything to make their lives generally uncomfortable.
3 posted on 03/28/2004 9:34:50 AM PST by coffeebreak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coffeebreak
I see no reason why both can't be done. In fact SHOULD be done.

Remove a judge only prevents that one judge from ruling, codify the constitution prevents ALL judges from ruling.

Additionally removing a judge may have an additional bonus, many judges have never worked a real job in their lives. A disgraced and removed judge will most likely end up very disorented.

There is one other step the public can do, start closing a few law schools. There are really far too many. Perhaps they could also require many of the core courses be taught by professors who have actual law practices, not these ivory tower dunsels.
4 posted on 03/28/2004 9:40:43 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Radix
""""About 120 canvassers who went door to door in the suburbs and several Boston neighborhoods connected with 819 voters yesterday morning""""

Can you say cherry picking the results...
5 posted on 03/28/2004 9:44:57 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; Radix
Bump & Ping


What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda


Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)


The Stamp of Normality

6 posted on 03/28/2004 9:53:47 AM PST by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping + Fighting Back in Massachusetts Alert.

Go, Good Guys, Go!!!

The more some people fight against the onslaught of the Homosexual Nazis (sorry, Polycarp - this is in-house!) the more fencesitters and wimps will gain courage and join the fight.

Anyone wanting on or off this pinglist should pingify me!
7 posted on 03/28/2004 10:17:13 AM PST by little jeremiah (...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson