Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Homer1
April 2000 was the Clinton administration. Not Bush.
4 posted on 03/28/2004 6:58:10 PM PST by tbeatty (Aprile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tbeatty; Homer1; cyncooper
This is a comparison of Clinton's 2000 report and Bush's 2001 report.

Excellent find, Homer.
6 posted on 03/28/2004 7:00:07 PM PST by EllaMinnow ("Pessimism never won any battle." - Dwight D. Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: tbeatty
But they purposely did NOT mention Clinton...so that the people will naturally assume it is about the Bush administration (since they are now the ones being raked over the coals.)
22 posted on 03/28/2004 7:38:35 PM PST by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: tbeatty
I was wondering who would catch that Bush didn't take office until Jan 2001.
36 posted on 03/28/2004 8:53:56 PM PST by Gkubly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: tbeatty
Yeah,but the Communist News Network and their brethren will once again count on the overwhelming ignorance of the('rat) populace.
66 posted on 04/01/2004 11:31:48 AM PST by macrahanish #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson