Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Wants Anthrax Probe Suit Dismissed
The Guardian ^ | 3/29/04 | JONATHAN D. SALANT

Posted on 03/29/2004 11:11:15 AM PST by TrebleRebel

U.S. Wants Anthrax Probe Suit Dismissed

Monday March 29, 2004 6:46 PM

By JONATHAN D. SALANT

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - The government asked a federal judge Monday to dismiss a lawsuit by Dr. Steven J. Hatfill, a bioterrorism expert who claims his reputation was ruined when law enforcement officials called him a ``person of interest'' in the 2001 anthrax attacks.

U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton said he would rule later, but did agree to a government request to further delay most trial preparations until October.

In his lawsuit filed last August, Hatfill said Attorney General John Ashcroft and others identified him as a person of interest to detract attention from their inability to find the person responsible for sending anthrax-laced envelopes to government and media offices in October 2001. He was the only person identified that way by government officials.

Five people died and 17 others were sickened by the anthrax attacks.

Hatfill, who has denied any role in the attacks, seeks to clear his name and recover unspecified monetary damages. His lawsuit claims the Justice Department got him fired from a job directing bioterrorism research at Louisiana State University, and that he has been unable to find another position in his field.

Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Bucholtz said Ashcroft's identification of Hatfill actually was an effort to ``downplay'' his status by making it clear he was not considered a suspect.

Hatfill lawyer Mark A. Grannis scoffed at that claim.

``Mr. Ashcroft acted to protect both the department and his own political image at the expense of Mr. Hatfill's constitutional rights,'' Grannis said.

Bucholtz also said Hatfill should have gone through federal administrative appeal procedures if he felt he was wrongly fired, because the LSU project was federally funded. Bucholtz added that Hatfill is not barred from any other job.

Judge Walton was skeptical Hatfill could find work in his field after being publicly linked to the anthrax investigation.

``At least by implication, he's disbarred,'' Walton said. ``The information is now out there. The man's a pariah. Nobody's going to hire him.''

Hatfill once worked as a researcher at the Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Md. The facility housed the strain of anthrax found in the envelopes sent to the victims, though Hatfill repeatedly has said he never worked with the infectious disease.

The FBI had Hatfill under 24-hour surveillance for many months following the attacks. In one incident, agents in a vehicle trailing Hatfill ran over his foot on a Washington street. Hatfill was not seriously hurt, and the surveillance has been curtailed.

In calling for the lawsuit to be dismissed, Bucholtz said Hatfill wants a judge to rule on whether the investigation was properly conducted, including whether the FBI surveillance was proper.

``It is the executive branch and not the courts that conduct criminal investigations,'' Bucholtz said.

Walton said judges needed to defer to law enforcement officials in criminal probes.

``I don't micromanage the investigation,'' Walton said. ``I don't know all of the information the government knows.''

Grannis said he wasn't asking the court to examine the Justice Department's every move.

``We're not asking for micromanagement here,'' Grannis said. ``We're asking for a day in court to cover abuses that have already occurred.''

In agreeing to further delay the trial, Walton backed the government's contention that Hatfill's requests for documents and interviews to prepare for the trial could hinder the ongoing probe.

``At some point, Dr. Hatfill is going to have to have his day in court,'' Walton said. ``I don't think that point has occurred yet.''


TOPICS: Anthrax Scare
KEYWORDS: anthrax; fbi; hatfill; lawsuit
Looks like the FBI have won another 6 months of cover-up.
1 posted on 03/29/2004 11:11:16 AM PST by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mitchell; Shermy; Battle Axe
ping
2 posted on 03/29/2004 11:12:22 AM PST by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TrebleRebel
Proves that the anthrax probe saga is too ridiculous to be ignored.
3 posted on 03/29/2004 11:27:02 AM PST by LurkedLongEnough (Bush '04 --- in a F'n landslide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TrebleRebel
In agreeing to further delay the trial, Walton backed the government's contention that Hatfill's requests for documents and interviews to prepare for the trial could hinder the ongoing probe.

Back in January, didn't the judge give the govt. 6 weeks to turn over information about Hatfill?

Will Tinkerbelle and Lucy take the stand? I like doggie stories...

4 posted on 03/29/2004 12:53:55 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TrebleRebel
The government needs until October just to make preparations for the trial? I know we're supposed to believe that the actual middle-aged ultra right-wing white guy is going to be arrested by then, but if you ask me they're just stonewalling.

And in October people will be conveniently distracted by the little matter of the Presidential election and no one will care about this trial, if they even remember it.

Speaking of the election, it will be interesting to see what happens with this whole farce should the unthinkable happen and John Kerry gets elected and AShcroft is no longer in charge of the government's lawyers.

5 posted on 03/29/2004 2:05:37 PM PST by jpl ("I actually voted for the $87 billion before I voted against it." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson