Replies

"A lot of personal attacks on Streisand on this thread...Not helpful..."

Not helpful, indeed. I haven't seen a single factual rejoinder to her accusations, just name-calling. I believe there are responses other than name-calling, so if anyone has the facts, please weigh in.

69 posted on 03/29/2004 1:48:20 PM PST by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")

To: Steve_Seattle

Uh, look again. There's plenty.

70 posted on 03/29/2004 1:49:10 PM PST by cyncooper ("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")

To: Steve_Seattle; dwd1

I believe there are responses other than name-calling, so if anyone has the facts, please weigh in.

It would take too long. It's too full of BS (the non-singing kind).

HOWEVER, for all of the democrats and their enablers, they have only to look at actions AFTER 9/11 to see who took the WOT seriously. Whether or not Bush and Co. took it seriously before is plain to any who will look at the evidence. Even if you doubt their commitment before the war, the democrats' commitment since is laid bare.

Could anyone connect the dots BEFORE 9/11? No one seems to have. However, there is a political party and a media that can't even connect the dots NOW.

Back to your question... why should be take these morons seriously?

78 posted on 03/29/2004 1:53:50 PM PST by pgyanke ("The Son of God became a man to enable men to become sons of God" - C.S. Lewis)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794