Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Atlantic Friend
Fallujah, is west of Baghdad, like 40 miles. It has nothing but agriculture. The Sunni triangle has little or no oil. Iraq's oil is in the North (Kurds) and the South (Shiites). There are many Syrian, Lebanese, etc. foreign Jihadis in the Fallujah area. They breath life into the dead Iraqi Ba'athist party. Imo, they believe the Ba'ath party of Syria may be able to restore the Ba'ath party of Iraq. But it is a pipe dream. The Kurds and Shiites would simply break-away if the Ba'athists took over the center of the country.

My guess is these attacks are done by foreign Jihadis, probably Syrians. The Sunnis have nothing but the hope of a central government and what they receive from it, yet they imperil it by their actions which will only embolden the independence wishes of the two other ethinc populations in the country which have Iraq's oil, the Kurds and the Shiites.

Imo the Syrian Ba'athists' plan is to drive the Americans out, take over central Iraq, move against the Kurds (for their oil) and deal with the Shiites in the south as best they can.

The Iranians in the south have a different plan, that is to take over the area, deal with either the Coalition or the Sunnis in the north as best they can and administer their area as a Shiite provence of Iran. In short, Syria wants the norther oil fields and Iran wants the southern oilfields. The 'Sunni triangle' is the Syrians' entry point and base of operations so they want the coalition out to increase their control. They have a long way to go and the 1st MEF to deal with. The Shiites otoh are wary of the Syrians, Ba'athists and the Sunnis altogether so for the time being, prefer the Coalition's presence.

Just my impression.

472 posted on 04/01/2004 2:31:08 AM PST by Justa (Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies ]


To: Justa
The Iranians in the south have a different plan, that is to take over the area, deal with either the Coalition or the Sunnis in the north as best they can and administer their area as a Shiite provence of Iran.

If the Iranians really wanted to, they could already have made things really hot for the coalition in the Shiite areas of southern Iraq. The fact that they haven't done so already suggests to me that the Iranian mullahs are hanging on by their fingernails inside Iran itself. They simply lack the resources to oppose the US at this time.

For now, the Iranians seem content to watch the events unfolding in Iraq while 'nudging' the local Ayatolla now & then. My 2 cents.

478 posted on 04/01/2004 6:32:28 AM PST by Tallguy (Cannot rate this Reserve Freepers fitness: Not observed on this thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies ]

To: Justa
Wow, you're one informed Freeper all right ! People should hire you for some ground intel.

I concur with you, regarding the Iraqi Baathists' hopes to get some help from their Syrian brothers. Syria and Iraq may have shared a common "ideology" (Stalin-style dictatorship) but there's precious little things to bind them together, and both countries were rivals in the past for UAR influence. After all, in 1991 Syria sent tanks to fight the Iraqis with the Desert Storm Coalition.
479 posted on 04/01/2004 6:40:54 AM PST by Atlantic Friend (Cursum Perficio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson