Skip to comments.
SANITIZING CLINTON & SASSING BUSH !
-- Richard Clarke's 'Big Lie' Exposed!
Iconoclast.ca ^
Posted on 04/01/2004 5:50:02 AM PST by Apolitical
These days, Richard Clarke is turning up everywhere on the media as George W. Bush's worst nightmare. In Clarke's many TV and talk-radio appearances, the silver-haired prevaricator -- acting as sole judge and jury -- calmly carries out an ideological lynching of America's current president on the terrorism issue, while extolling his own alleged virtues and wisdom on the subject. But strangely enough, although Clarke has nary a good word to say about George W. Bush who has decisively and courageously taken the War on Terror to the terrorists' own home turf (a beleaguered nation's best defense is indeed often its offense), Richard Clarke is weirdly mum about the national-security deficiencies of the presidential administration that really left America politically and phsyically defenseless against the 9/11 onslaught -- the self-serving presidential reign of Bill Clinton.......
(Excerpt) Read more at iconoclast.ca ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 911; clarke; clinton; coverup; richardclarke
Richard Clarke, Democratic Trojan horse.
To: Apolitical
Richard Clarke is not W's "worst nightmare". He's a pathetic old windbag. Just look at him. Is this someone you could trust? Just listen to him. Is this someone you could trust? C'mon Iconoclast, buy a clue.
2
posted on
04/01/2004 5:53:58 AM PST
by
sarasota
To: Apolitical
A self-important government bow-wow. He is not my government. He cannot apologise for anyone and he does not speak for me.
To: sarasota
Last night on Smarmball it looked the twins from Hell.
4
posted on
04/01/2004 5:56:36 AM PST
by
CMailBag
To: Apolitical
I used to get a real bad case of torque-jaw when the Dims brought out these sick, pathetic lies. These days, i realize that they are so sick and pathetic that the public is not fooled by it. In fact, it probably helps us more than it hurts us to see how sick the Dim party and its supporters can be.
5
posted on
04/01/2004 5:57:54 AM PST
by
trebb
(Ain't God good . . .)
To: Apolitical
6
posted on
04/01/2004 6:02:55 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: Apolitical
I knew Richard Clarke was in trouble with the swing voters when my mom made a statement comparing him to Paul O'Neill. (Mom is definitely a swing voter, and she did not buy Richard Clarke pretty much from the beginning)
7
posted on
04/01/2004 6:07:43 AM PST
by
stylin_geek
(Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
To: CMailBag
So I heard. Two windbags trying to make it all better.
8
posted on
04/01/2004 6:13:30 AM PST
by
sarasota
To: Apolitical
You couldn't sanitize Clinton if you tried.
9
posted on
04/01/2004 6:32:15 AM PST
by
freekitty
To: Diogenesis
Speaking of Miniter.... here's his assessment of Clarke
Against Selected Enemies
The Wall Street Journal ^ | April 1, 2004 | RICHARD MINITER
Posted on 03/31/2004 11:39:14 PM PST by neverdem
To: stylin_geek
O'Neill's book has sold, what, 35 copies ?
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson