Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Girl Banned From Prom For Smoking Away From School
www.thekansascitychannel.com ^ | March 31, 2004

Posted on 04/01/2004 11:26:18 AM PST by Freedom2specul8

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-316 next last
To: excalibur1701
State law trumps the school board, not the other way around.
41 posted on 04/01/2004 11:45:11 AM PST by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: excalibur1701
It's not about cigarettes, it's about the long arm of the law.. The child is old enough to vote, and old enough to purchase cigarettes... That's the law. We do not pay the school district to punish monitor our children outside of their jurisdiction...that's not their problem..it's ours.



42 posted on 04/01/2004 11:45:19 AM PST by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Some rules have no legal basis, and should be broken.

I agree completely. Hopefully, the kids are learning this too.

43 posted on 04/01/2004 11:45:22 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: excalibur1701
If someone comes up positive on a drug test (which they do on their own time in their own home), do we not have a right to terminate that employee?

Last I checked, smoking was legal. Try again.

44 posted on 04/01/2004 11:45:26 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Information on this incident seems to be lacking. Was she at a School event off school grounds?
45 posted on 04/01/2004 11:45:26 AM PST by Bob J (www.freerepublic.net www.radiofreerepublic.com...check them out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I don't understand the purpose of harassing and punishing the students when they are supposed to be under parental or guardian control..

Allow me to 'splain it to ya:
The concept of "parental or guardian control" is outdated and no longer useful.
Such ideas tend to spread the concept of liberty and THAT we cannot have.
This is a proper exercise of local government - doing the bidding of the national government without direct involvement.
Now do you understand?
If not, please report to the Ministry of Truth tomorrow morning at 7:00 A.M.

46 posted on 04/01/2004 11:45:47 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All
Sheesh...didn't mean to bring about so much friction. I'll make it up to you all.

B U S H 2 0 0 4!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Am I forgiven now? :)
47 posted on 04/01/2004 11:45:50 AM PST by excalibur1701
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: excalibur1701
if the rules are established "ahead of time", and she does not follow the rules, then the only person to blame is herself. What lessons are we teaching our kids if we back off on any rule, and let the students have their ways.

. . . a perfectly sensible stance if the rules established "ahead of time" make sense themselves. That school feels it can make rules it can enforce outside of its sphere of influence, i.e., the school grounds, especially when it comes to of-age citizens participating in perfectly legal activity, does not make sense.

Sweet weeping Jesus. Exactly what did all these arthritic, incontinent, marmish administrators do back in the Glory Days when there was nothing for them to administer to the brink of disaster?


48 posted on 04/01/2004 11:46:18 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (The Spirit of 1775 Lives on in Massachusetts. Long live Samuel Adams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

DIS---MISSED!!!

49 posted on 04/01/2004 11:46:43 AM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: excalibur1701
I'm amazed at how many people think it's ok for this kid to be smoking at such a young age.

Uh, dude, I hate to break this to you, but the legislators of the state in question set the legal smoking age at 18. If you have a beef, take it up with them. Until then, she's being punished for engaging in a legal activity.

50 posted on 04/01/2004 11:46:54 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kingu
Well, if they can't, they get social services to intrude on the family homestead...
51 posted on 04/01/2004 11:46:56 AM PST by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: excalibur1701
The "rule" itself is illegal. What will you say if they come up with a rule that says you can't go to the prom if you drink caffeine? Or you can't wear red? Or, you can't drink alcohol? (18 is the legal age in some states) Or, you can't go to the prom if you vote a certain way?

Think, man, think!
52 posted on 04/01/2004 11:48:09 AM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: excalibur1701
We have drug testing at here at work, because of the heavy machinery we use and to keep people as safe as possible. If someone comes up positive on a drug test (which they do on their own time in their own home), do we not have a right to terminate that employee?

Bad analogy. She's not doing anything illegal. I think this rule needs to be modified to apply to minors, not those who have reached the age of adulthood. A challenge to a bad rule isn't out of line here.

53 posted on 04/01/2004 11:48:17 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (You need tons click "co-ordinating" -- be a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
And yet employer's can drug test for nicotine as well.

The corner we've painted ourselves into with drug testing is that the powers that be have steadfastly argued that workplace testing has nothing to do with the legal system, since violators aren't arrested. They did this as an end run around the 4th amendment. Now its rearing its head in all sorts of health-related ways. The more the merrier.

54 posted on 04/01/2004 11:48:19 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: excalibur1701
B U S H 2 0 0 4!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Am I forgiven now? :)

Only if you really mean it!

55 posted on 04/01/2004 11:48:36 AM PST by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: excalibur1701
Are you SURE you belong here?
56 posted on 04/01/2004 11:48:41 AM PST by Hanging Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
No doubt this school allows their students to pierce whatever part of their anatomy they please ... tattoo's wherever, but hot damn ... you better not be caught smoking.
57 posted on 04/01/2004 11:48:52 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excalibur1701
I'm amazed at how many people think it's ok for this kid to be smoking at such a young age.

So, now it's not what the law says, it's that you don't think it's OK. Failing a drug test is evidence of illegal activity. An 18 year old smoking in a state where it's legal for an 18 year old to smoke is not the same thing.

Your logic is the reverse of the idiot mayor of San Francisco ... he doesn't like a law, he ignores it. You don't like a legal behavior, you want to punish it.

Trade in the dress for some jackboots

58 posted on 04/01/2004 11:48:52 AM PST by tx_eggman (Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit softly. Teddy Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Not to mention old enough to go to Iraq and get shot at, blown up, and burned and hung from a bridge. Either your an adult at 18 or not.
59 posted on 04/01/2004 11:48:52 AM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Hey, you are so right!! That's the truth. I have first hand experience. The cops don't have to help parents find 18 yr old missing children.
60 posted on 04/01/2004 11:49:14 AM PST by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-316 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson