[Apolitical]

Clarke definitely should be nominated for a Pulitzer Prize in fiction writing. Look at how he unjustly and incorrectly slurred Condi Rice. The man wouldn't know the truth if he bumped into it.

Another deceitful Clinton acolyte.

[Support Free Republic]

Click Here to Donate to Free Republic By Secure Server

Or mail checks to:        
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

Or you can use:                     
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
Found in the breaking news sidebar!

[jonno]

Can someone provide the quick "lowdown" on the reported discrepancy between what Clark vs. Cheney vs. C. Rice said regarding the events of Sept 12 and who was "in-the-loop".

Thanks

[Shermy]

If the Bush Administration truly wanted to lay blame at the feet of Saddam Hussein for September 11th, why would they have even mentioned bin Laden, al Qaida, the Taliban or Afghanistan?

Yawn. The question it why would "they", the DNC, Kerry and lefty pundits want to erase memories about 9/11, Afghanistan, Bali, etc. etc. in order to highlight Iraq? The purpose is to paint "Iraq" as the singular obsession of Bush so when, they hope, things fall apart there they can claim it's all Bush's fault, Iraq was Bush's "obsession", disassociate all pre-9/11 context from Iraq, and Kerry wraps it up saying he was "misled" by Bush - which explains his vote on the "war" (though not on the ILA).

This is their game plan, Clarke supporting from the flank. It's a semantic war, a political campaign of definition. Did you notice how Kerry in the past few months stopped harping on supporting our troops and how important it was to succeed in Iraq? He's betting on it falling apart. Maybe he's making "gestures" to Iran and Saudi to heat up things there before the election.

[facedown]

...that anyone who isn't legally blind can see it is politically motivated.

That's an insult to the legally blind.