More leaks from an investigation into leaks
1 posted on
04/01/2004 9:26:46 PM PST by
Shermy
To: All
To: marron; okie01; Carl/NewsMax; Kenny Bunk; Jeff Gannon; seamole
Mr. Wilson, in a July 6, 2003, Op-Ed commentary in The New York Times, disputed Mr. Bush's statement in his State of the Union address that January that Iraq was trying to develop a nuclear bomb and had sought to buy uranium in Africa. Now, that's not quite true.
3 posted on
04/01/2004 9:28:32 PM PST by
Shermy
To: Shermy
and for the first time raised the possibility of bringing charges peripheral to the leak itself can't find a leaker?? just charge them with something else.
wala, instant scandal. no evidence required.
INVESTIGATE CONGRESS!
4 posted on
04/01/2004 9:29:03 PM PST by
GeronL
(Hey, I am on the internet. I have a right (cough, cough) to write stupid things.)
To: Shermy
Could have predicted this was going to happen. Ahab Walsh redux.
To: Shermy
Was Mr. Fitzgerald appointed by Bill Clinton?
Does he have ties to Daly's machine?
Just curious.
17 posted on
04/01/2004 9:57:50 PM PST by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
To: Shermy
There is no real news in the report, so one can only conclude that the NYT is firing a shot across Fitzgerald's bow, warning him about "intense criticism" of he doesn't make the Democrats happy.
18 posted on
04/01/2004 10:03:13 PM PST by
beckett
To: Shermy
Joe Wilson's book is due out any day now. He needs publicity.
30 posted on
04/01/2004 10:37:50 PM PST by
hershey
To: Shermy
I have never seen a case that is going nowhere as slowly as this one. And "nowhere" is exactly where it will end up.
To: Shermy
OHHHH They mean the Joe Wilson who works for a think tank funded by SAUDI ARABIA!!! Gotcha. ;)
40 posted on
04/02/2004 3:26:13 AM PST by
adam_az
(Call your state Republican party office and VOLUNTEER FOR A CAMPAIGN!!!)
To: Shermy
prosecutors have widened the range of conduct under scrutiny and for the first time raised the possibility of bringing charges peripheral to the leak itself. I've stated all along they would widen the range, but I don't think it's in the direction this article states.
41 posted on
04/02/2004 6:12:02 AM PST by
cyncooper
("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
To: Shermy
"Republican lawyers worried that the leak case, in the hands of an aggressive prosecutor, might grow into an unwieldy, time-consuming and politically charged inquiry,"This is the playbook from now until November. If they've got nothing, theey're forced to make it up and start an official inquiry. Repubs better grow some cajones and stop this crap. You'd never guess we were in charge. Never.
43 posted on
04/02/2004 6:42:58 AM PST by
chiller
(JUDGES is JOB #1)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson